Core Viewpoint - The company Ryohin Keikaku, which operates the MUJI brand, has lost a legal battle in China regarding the use of the "MUJI" trademark for certain products, specifically those classified under "Class 24" such as towels and bed covers [2][4]. Group 1 - The Chinese local enterprise registered the "MUJI" trademark first, leading to Ryohin Keikaku's unsuccessful attempt to invalidate this registration [2][4]. - The Supreme People's Court rejected Ryohin Keikaku's request for retrial in June, confirming the company's defeat in the trademark dispute [4]. - Ryohin Keikaku had filed for the invalidation of the trademark in 2019, but their claims were not recognized in subsequent legal proceedings, including a lawsuit initiated in 2020 [4]. Group 2 - Ryohin Keikaku can still use the "MUJI" trademark for products outside of Class 24, but for Class 24 products, they will continue to use the "MUJI" brand [4]. - The company stated that the impact on sales is minimal due to the continued use of the "MUJI" trademark for these products [4].