Core Viewpoint - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) is more cost-effective and offers broader sector coverage compared to the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG), which has higher expenses and focuses specifically on food and beverage companies [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while FTXG charges 0.60% - The one-year return for VDC is 12.06%, compared to FTXG's 9.78% - VDC offers a dividend yield of 2.10%, whereas FTXG provides a higher yield of 2.75% - VDC has assets under management (AUM) of $9.05 billion, significantly larger than FTXG's $17.89 million [3][4]. Performance and Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, VDC experienced a maximum drawdown of 16.55%, while FTXG had a higher drawdown of 21.71% - An investment of $1,000 in VDC would have grown to $1,385 over five years, compared to $925 for FTXG [5]. Fund Composition - FTXG focuses on the food and beverage sector, holding 31 stocks with 91% in consumer defensive, 7% in basic materials, and 2% in industrials; top holdings include PepsiCo, Archer-Daniels-Midland, and Mondelez International [6]. - VDC tracks a broader consumer staples basket with 103 holdings, 98% in consumer defensive and 2% in consumer cyclical; top stocks include Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [7]. Implications for Investors - Both VDC and FTXG provide exposure to the consumer staples sector, but the choice depends on whether investors prefer FTXG's focus on food and beverage or VDC's broader approach [8]. - For those without existing holdings in the consumer staples industry or looking to expand, VDC is recommended over FTXG for its advantages [9].

Core Insights - The Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and the First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) both focus on the defensive side of the U.S. stock market but differ in their investment approach and sector focus [1] Cost & Size Comparison - FTXG has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while FSTA has a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% [2] - As of January 29, 2026, FTXG reported a 1-year return of -1.54%, compared to FSTA's 4.29% [2] - FTXG offers a higher dividend yield of 2.94% versus FSTA's 2.24% [2] - FTXG has assets under management (AUM) of $16.7 million, while FSTA has a much larger AUM of $1.3 billion [2] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, FTXG experienced a maximum drawdown of -21.68%, while FSTA had a lower maximum drawdown of -16.57% [4] - An investment of $1,000 in FTXG would have grown to $907, whereas the same investment in FSTA would have grown to $1,311 over five years [4] Portfolio Composition - FSTA aims to replicate the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples 25/50 Index and includes 96 holdings, providing broad diversification within consumer staples [5] - The top three holdings in FSTA—Costco Wholesale, Walmart, and Procter & Gamble—constitute nearly 37% of its assets [5] - FTXG targets the Nasdaq US Smart Food & Beverage Index and is more concentrated with only 30 holdings [6] - The top three stocks in FTXG—Archer-Daniels-Midland, PepsiCo, and Mondelez International—account for over 23% of its assets [6] Investment Implications - Consumer staples stocks are generally considered safer investments, less impacted by economic fluctuations, making ETFs like FSTA and FTXG appealing for stability [7] - FSTA's broader approach includes a wider range of consumer staples, while FTXG's focus on food and beverage may yield higher returns due to its targeted strategy [8][9]

Core Insights - The article compares two ETFs in the consumer staples sector: State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI), highlighting their differences in focus, cost, performance, and holdings [1][5]. Group 1: ETF Overview - XLP consists of 36 U.S. consumer defensive stocks, including major companies like Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble, providing targeted exposure to established U.S. staples [2]. - KXI, with a portfolio of 96 companies, offers global exposure, with 59% in U.S. stocks, 29% in European stocks, and 7% in Asian stocks, featuring both U.S. giants and international leaders like Nestle and Unilever [3][7]. Group 2: Performance and Fees - XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% and a higher dividend yield of 2.7%, compared to KXI's expense ratio of 0.39% and dividend yield of 2.3%, making it more appealing for income-focused investors [4][8]. - Over the last five years, XLP generated a total return of 36.2% (CAGR of 6.4%), outperforming KXI, which had a total return of 28.1% (CAGR of 5.1%), although both funds lagged behind the S&P 500's CAGR of 14.6% [8]. Group 3: Investment Considerations - XLP is recommended for investors seeking exposure to the U.S. consumer staples market due to its better performance, yield, and fees, while KXI offers regional diversification as its main advantage [9].

Core Insights - The iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK) and iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) cater to investors interested in the consumer staples sector, with IYK focusing on U.S. companies and KXI offering a broader global perspective [1][2] Group 1: Cost & Size - Both IYK and KXI have similar expense ratios, with IYK at 0.38% and KXI at 0.39% [3][4] - As of January 9, 2026, IYK has a one-year return of 6.2% and a dividend yield of 2.7%, while KXI has a one-year return of 11.2% and a dividend yield of 2.2% [3][10] - IYK has assets under management (AUM) of $1.2 billion, while KXI has AUM of $908.7 million [3][9] Group 2: Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, IYK has experienced a maximum drawdown of -15.04%, while KXI's maximum drawdown is -17.43% [5] - The growth of a $1,000 investment over five years is $1,139 for IYK and $1,136 for KXI, indicating similar performance [5] Group 3: Portfolio Composition - KXI holds 96 global equities, with major positions in Walmart, Costco, and Philip Morris, and is heavily weighted towards consumer defensive stocks [6] - IYK is concentrated on 54 U.S. holdings, with significant investments in Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and also includes exposure to healthcare and basic materials [7][10] Group 4: Investor Implications - Income-oriented investors may prefer IYK due to its higher dividend yield, while those seeking international exposure may favor KXI for its broader global holdings [11]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent insider trading activity at Campbell Soup Company, highlighting a significant sale by an executive amid declining stock performance and financial metrics. Company Overview - Campbell Soup Company generates revenue primarily through the manufacture and sale of branded food and beverage products across various channels, including retail, foodservice, and e-commerce, both in the United States and internationally [1] - The company offers a diversified portfolio of packaged foods, including soups, broths, sauces, snacks, bakery products, and beverages under well-known brands such as Campbell's, Swanson, Pepperidge Farm, Goldfish, Snyder's of Hanover, and V8 [1] - Campbell Soup is a leading player in the packaged foods sector, with over $10 billion in trailing twelve months (TTM) revenue and a broad product lineup [5] Recent Insider Trading Activity - Charles A. Brawley III, an executive vice president at Campbell Soup, sold 11,550 shares for $325,075 on December 31, which accounted for 20.88% of his direct equity stake, reducing his position from 55,327 to 43,777 shares [3][4] - The sale was an open-market transaction from direct ownership, with no indirect entities or derivative instruments involved [4][3] - This transaction represents a reduction of approximately 21% in Brawley's direct stake and is noted as the larger of his two open market sales on record [7] Financial Performance Context - Campbell Soup's stock has fallen 33% over the past year, significantly underperforming the S&P 500, which gained approximately 17% during the same period [6] - In its most recent quarter, the company reported a 3% decline in net sales to $2.7 billion, with adjusted EBIT falling 11% and adjusted EPS sliding 13%, indicating volume pressure and margin compression [6] - Despite these challenges, Campbell continues to return cash through dividends and buybacks and has reaffirmed its full-year guidance [8]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has outperformed the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) by over 2% in the last year due to lower fees and broader diversification [1][14] - VDC offers lower costs and slightly stronger recent performance, while RSPS provides a concentrated, equal-weighted approach within the consumer staples sector [1][2] Cost Comparison - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09%, significantly lower than RSPS's 0.40% [3][4] - VDC's assets under management (AUM) stand at $8.6 billion, compared to RSPS's $236.2 million [3] Performance Metrics - The one-year return for VDC is 0.05%, while RSPS has a return of (3.2%) as of December 17, 2025 [3] - Over five years, VDC has grown $1,000 to $1,244, while RSPS has decreased it to $988 [5] Portfolio Composition - VDC holds 105 stocks, with a portfolio that is 98% consumer defensive, featuring major positions in Walmart (14.53%), Costco (12.00%), and Procter & Gamble (10.09%) [6][12] - RSPS consists of 38 equally weighted stocks, with top holdings including Dollar General (3.52%) and Monster Beverage (3.34%) [8][12] Risk Assessment - The maximum drawdown over five years for VDC is (16.55%), while RSPS has a higher drawdown of (18.64%) [5] - VDC has a beta of 0.56, indicating slightly higher volatility compared to RSPS's beta of 0.52 [3] Investment Implications - Both ETFs focus on the defensive consumer staples sector, appealing to investors seeking stability and reliable dividends during economic uncertainty [13][14] - Investors must consider the trade-offs between VDC's lower costs and concentration in large-cap stocks versus RSPS's equal weighting that may reduce single-stock risk [11][14]

Core Insights - The State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has lower fees, a deeper sector focus, and significantly higher assets under management compared to the iShares US Consumer Staples ETF (IYK), which has shown slightly better recent returns and a shallower maximum drawdown [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - XLP has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while IYK charges 0.38% [3][4]. - Both ETFs offer a dividend yield of 2.7% [3][4]. - Assets under management for XLP stand at $14.7 billion, compared to IYK's $1.2 billion [3]. Performance and Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, IYK experienced a maximum drawdown of 15.04%, while XLP had a drawdown of 16.31% [5]. - A $1,000 investment in IYK would have grown to $1,178, while the same investment in XLP would have grown to $1,163 over five years [5]. Holdings and Sector Exposure - XLP holds 36 stocks, focusing exclusively on U.S. consumer defensive companies, with major positions in Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [6]. - IYK contains 54 stocks, with a broader allocation of 85% in consumer defensive, 12% in healthcare, and 2% in basic materials, featuring top holdings like Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola, and Philip Morris International [7]. Investment Returns - Over the last five years, IYK provided a total return of $298 on a $1,000 investment, while XLP yielded a return of $314 [8]. - Over a ten-year period, a $1,000 investment in IYK grew to $1,321, whereas XLP's equivalent investment grew to $1,010 [9].

Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a larger asset base and a longer track record compared to the Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA), making it a more established option for investors [1][10]. Cost & Size - FSTA has an expense ratio of 0.08%, while VDC's is slightly higher at 0.09%, indicating that FSTA is marginally more affordable [3][4]. - As of the latest data, FSTA manages $1.3 billion in assets under management (AUM), whereas VDC has $7.4 billion in AUM, highlighting VDC's significant size advantage [3][10]. Performance & Risk - Over the past year, FSTA has returned -2.7% and VDC has returned -2.4%, showing that VDC has performed slightly better [3][15]. - The maximum drawdown over five years for FSTA is -17.08%, while VDC's is -16.54%, indicating that VDC has experienced less volatility [5]. Portfolio Composition - VDC holds 107 stocks primarily focused on consumer defensive companies, with top holdings including Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble [6]. - FSTA has a similar focus, with 98% of its holdings in consumer defensive stocks and also includes Walmart, Costco, and Procter & Gamble among its top holdings [7]. Historical Performance - VDC has been operational for nearly 22 years, while FSTA was launched in 2013, giving VDC a historical performance advantage [10]. - Since FSTA's inception, it has achieved a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5%, while VDC has a CAGR of 8.7%, indicating comparable long-term performance [15].

Core Insights - The Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and the State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) provide exposure to the U.S. consumer staples sector, with XLP being slightly cheaper and offering a higher yield, while VDC has a broader portfolio and better five-year returns [1][2][8] Cost & Size - VDC has an expense ratio of 0.09% and assets under management (AUM) of $8.6 billion, while XLP has a lower expense ratio of 0.08% and a larger AUM of $15.3 billion [3][4] - The one-year return for VDC is -2.4% compared to XLP's -3.4%, and the dividend yield for VDC is 2.2% versus XLP's 2.7% [3][4] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over five years, VDC has a maximum drawdown of -17.6% and has grown $1,000 to $1,246, while XLP has a maximum drawdown of -17.8% and has grown $1,000 to $1,180 [5] Portfolio Composition - XLP holds 36 stocks with a 100% allocation to consumer defensive companies, led by Walmart (11.9%), Costco Wholesale (9.2%), and Procter & Gamble (7.8%) [6] - VDC has a broader approach with 105 holdings, 98% in consumer defensive, and top positions including Walmart (14.2%), Costco Wholesale (13.0%), and Procter & Gamble (11.2%) [7] Investor Considerations - XLP's lower expense ratio and higher yield may attract cost- and income-focused investors, while VDC's broader portfolio and stronger five-year total return may appeal to those seeking diversification [8][10] - The concentration of XLP with only 36 stocks could be a risk if the largest holdings underperform, whereas VDC's wider scope may provide better resilience [9][10]

Core Insights - The article compares two consumer staples ETFs: Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP), highlighting their similarities and differences in terms of holdings, performance, and cost [6][9]. Fund Overview - Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) includes 103 stocks, providing broader coverage in the consumer defensive sector, with significant holdings in Walmart, Costco Wholesale, and Procter & Gamble [2]. - State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) focuses on 37 companies, primarily large-cap stocks, and aims to mirror the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index [3]. Performance Metrics - XLP offers a higher dividend yield of 2.7% compared to VDC's 2.2%, making it more appealing for income-focused investors [7]. - Both funds have low expense ratios and solid long-term performance histories, making them suitable for buy-and-hold investors [9]. Holdings Composition - XLP has a higher weighting in consumer non-durables, while VDC has a greater focus on retail stocks [8]. Investment Considerations - Income-oriented investors may prefer XLP due to its higher dividend yield, while those bullish on retail may favor VDC [9].