新华社电 中国科协2月10日发布的《科技期刊世界影响力指数（WJCI）报告（2025版）》显示，WJCI 指数学科排名位列全球前5%的中国期刊达76种。中国期刊整体影响力不断攀升，在部分领域已达到国 际顶尖水平。 报告指出，随着世界一流科技期刊建设工作深入推进，我国科技期刊的国际影响力和传播力持续增强。 报告2025版收录中国科技期刊1906种，比2020版增加了480种；中国科技期刊刊均WJCI指数为1.490， 世界排名第7位，比2020版上升了5个位次；刊均影响因子达2.434，比2020版的1.105增长了1.2倍。 中国科技期刊学科排名持续攀升，总体在分区中稳步上升。报告2025版显示，进入Q1区（前25%）的 中国科技期刊达362种，比2020版增加了190种；进入Q1和Q2区（前50%）的中国科技期刊排重后共902 种，比2020版增加了414种。 此外，中国科技期刊在地质学、工程综合等31个学科表现突出，排名进入前50%的期刊均在10种以上， 表明在这些学科领域我国科技期刊发展相对较好、优势显著。 中国科协科学技术创新部负责人介绍，相比其他期刊评价体系，本版报告融合影响因子、总被引频次、 网络 ...

（文章来源：新华社） 中国科协10日发布的《科技期刊世界影响力指数（WJCI）报告（2025版）》显示，WJCI指数学科排名 位列全球前5%的中国期刊达76种。中国期刊整体影响力不断攀升，在部分领域已达到国际顶尖水平。 报告2025版收录中国科技期刊1906种，比2020版增加了480种；中国科技期刊刊均WJCI指数为1.490， 世界排名第7位，比2020版上升了5个位次；刊均影响因子达2.434，比2020版的1.105增长了1.2倍。 ...

Core Insights - The total number of scientific journals in China is projected to increase from 5,211 in 2023 to 5,325 in 2024, indicating a steady rise in overall influence [1] - From 2015 to 2024, over 12 million papers were published, accumulating more than 71 million citations, with an average citation rate of nearly 6 times per paper [1] - Approximately 737 Chinese journals are included in the global Q1 and Q2 categories, with about 71% of English journals and 35% of Chinese journals positioned in these categories, showcasing strong international competitiveness [1] Industry Development - The development of Chinese scientific journals has established a dual-track system: Chinese journals focus on domestic innovation and economic development, while English journals emphasize international dissemination and global competition [1] - The regional distribution, publication cycles, and subject distribution of scientific journals in China are relatively stable, indicating a mature journal ecosystem [1] Challenges and Recommendations - The blue paper highlights several challenges in the academic publishing capacity of Chinese scientific journals, including gaps in interdisciplinary journal layouts compared to developed countries, insufficient decision-making support, and noticeable outflow of quality manuscripts [1][2] - Recommendations include fostering the development of journals in characteristic disciplines, enhancing decision-making support through strategic topic planning, and integrating technologies like artificial intelligence into the publishing process [2] - The establishment of a self-evaluation system to guide the publication of outstanding results in domestic journals is also suggested [2]