Core Viewpoint - The company is involved in a trademark lawsuit regarding the "Doctor" trademark, which has been revoked by the Supreme Court, but it holds alternative trademarks that mitigate the impact on its operations [1] Group 1: Trademark Litigation Progress - On November 5, 2021, a party applied to the National Intellectual Property Administration to revoke the "Doctor" trademark due to non-use for three consecutive years [1] - The National Intellectual Property Administration initially rejected the revocation request but later decided to revoke the trademark registration [1] - The company lost in both the first instance at the Beijing Intellectual Property Court and the second instance at the Beijing High People's Court, leading to a request for retrial at the Supreme People's Court [1] Group 2: Supreme Court Decision and Impact - In 2025, the Supreme People's Court rejected the retrial application, resulting in the termination of the trademark rights effective January 27, 2025 [1] - The company possesses two other similar trademarks with slightly different service scopes, which helps to mitigate the adverse effects of the trademark revocation [1] - The company's self-owned products did not utilize the disputed trademark, indicating that the ruling will not have a significant negative impact on its operations [1]