Core Viewpoint - The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) challenges the long-held belief that creativity is a uniquely human trait, as AI-generated works can now rival those created by humans, leading to a blurred line in the scientific definition of creativity [1][2]. Group 1: AI and Creativity - AI systems have shown the ability to produce works that are comparable to human creations in various fields, including poetry and applications, but top human creators still maintain an advantage in narrative quality and creativity [2][4]. - Research indicates that while AI can generate creative outputs, it does not undergo the genuine creative process that humans do, which is essential for true creativity [4][6]. Group 2: Human-AI Collaboration - Many scientists are shifting their focus to the interaction between humans and machines, exploring the concept of "collaborative creativity," where AI serves as a new medium for human artistic expression [7]. - Examples of innovative human-AI collaborations include "fault art," where artists utilize electronic device malfunctions to create unique aesthetic expressions, and the "Imitating Poet" device that fosters a creative dialogue between users and AI [7]. Group 3: Potential Risks and Concerns - There are concerns regarding the potential risks of relying on AI for creative processes, such as reduced brain activity in participants and a tendency towards homogenized creative outputs, which may threaten cultural diversity [8]. - The debate continues on whether AI provides equitable creative opportunities, as it can lower barriers for non-musicians but may also exacerbate existing inequalities if access to quality AI resources is unevenly distributed [8].