值得关注的是，在近视低龄化趋势显著的当下，高度近视若不及时干预可能引发视网膜脱离等严重眼部 疾病。目前，SVS镜因安全廉价被广泛使用，而OK镜和DS镜作为新型手段逐渐受到关注。 研究团队表示，本研究也存在局限性，未来还需进一步研究不同品牌镜片的差异，为个性化矫正方案提 供更精准的依据。 中证报中证网讯(王珞)近日，辽宁何氏医学院余斯乐副教授团队联合沈阳何氏眼科（301103）医院临床 研究部专家秦光浩团队等，共同合作在眼科国际期刊《BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY》上发表研究 论文，评估并比较我国近视儿童及青少年佩戴角膜塑形镜(OK镜)、离焦眼镜(DS镜)和单光眼镜(SVS镜) 的视力相关生活质量以及临床疗效，为近视光学干预的临床选择提供了重要参考。 近年来，何氏眼科积极响应"光明工程"国家倡议，联合辽宁何氏医学院和何氏眼产业集团，依托辽宁省 青少年近视防控基地和沈阳市数字化青少年近视防控重点实验室，借助大数据、人工智能、基因等新技 术，构建"365近视防控体系"。该体系以"精准"为首要原则，根据基因检测和视力检查数据定制个性化 方案，弥补传统模式不足；涵盖近视发展全周期，包含预防、预警、控制和干 ...

Core Insights - The research published in the international ophthalmology journal "BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY" evaluates and compares the effectiveness and quality of life related to vision for children and adolescents wearing orthokeratology lenses (OK lenses), defocus glasses (DS glasses), and single vision glasses (SVS glasses) in China [1][2][3] Group 1: Research Findings - The study involved a cohort of 93 myopic children aged 7 to 17, divided into three groups wearing OK lenses, DS glasses, and SVS glasses, with a follow-up period of one year [1] - The results indicated significant differences in axial length growth among the three groups: the OK lens group showed an increase of only 0.18±0.08 mm, while the DS lens group had 0.27±0.08 mm, and the SVS lens group had 0.36±0.09 mm [2] - The OK lenses were found to control axial growth approximately 33% better than DS glasses and 50% better than SVS glasses, highlighting the advantages of newer lens types in preventing myopia progression [2] Group 2: Quality of Life Assessment - The study assessed quality of life using the internationally recognized "Children's Refractive Error Quality of Life Questionnaire" (PREP), which covers various dimensions such as distance vision, activity ability, and peer evaluation [1] - OK lenses demonstrated superior performance in multiple quality of life indicators, attributed to factors such as not needing to wear glasses during the day, unrestricted movement, reduced appearance anxiety, and clearer vision [2] - However, OK lenses had lower comfort scores compared to single vision glasses and required more complex maintenance, while DS glasses had lower scores in "near vision" due to their optical design [2] Group 3: Practical Implications - The research provides comprehensive insights for parents and doctors, indicating that while OK lenses have overall better performance, they may not be suitable for all children due to the need for strict screening of eye health and potential infection risks from improper maintenance [3] - DS glasses and SVS glasses are suggested to be more appropriate for children in conditions with limited hygiene or those unable to comply with nighttime lens wear [3]