Core Viewpoint - The New York Attorney General has filed a lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the bank misled customers regarding the existence of a higher interest savings account, similar to previous allegations made by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) [1][6]. Group 1: Allegations Against Capital One - The lawsuit claims that Capital One marketed its 360 Savings accounts as having "one of the nation's best savings rates" while keeping interest rates "artificially low" despite rising rates nationwide [2]. - It is alleged that Capital One created a "nearly identical" savings account called 360 Performance Savings, which offered interest rates up to 14 times higher than the 360 Savings account [3]. - The lawsuit accuses Capital One of intentionally misleading its 360 Savings customers about the existence of the 360 Performance Savings account to avoid paying them additional interest [3]. Group 2: Responses from Capital One - A spokesperson for Capital One stated that the bank "strongly" disagrees with the attorney general's claims and intends to "vigorously defend" itself in court [4]. - Capital One emphasized its pride in the 360 suite of banking products, asserting that they offer great rates with no fees and no minimums, and that the 360 Performance Savings product was widely marketed [5].

Core Viewpoint - Capital One Financial Corp is facing a lawsuit from New York Attorney General Letitia James, accusing the bank of misleading customers regarding interest payments on its savings accounts, resulting in significant financial losses for consumers [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit alleges that Capital One marketed its "360 Savings" account as a high-yield savings option but failed to inform customers about the superior "360 Performance Savings" product, which offered interest rates as high as 4.35% [3][4]. - Capital One reportedly froze the interest rate of its 360 Savings product at 0.3% while the new product provided substantially higher returns, leading to millions of dollars in lost interest for customers [4]. - The complaint claims that Capital One instructed employees not to disclose the new product to 360 Savings customers unless specifically asked [4]. Group 2: Regulatory Context - This lawsuit follows a similar case previously filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was dropped earlier this year under the Trump administration, alleging that Capital One's marketing practices caused U.S. customers to miss out on over $2 billion in interest [5]. - The New York Attorney General's office is seeking restitution and damages for all affected Capital One customers, asserting violations of state and federal law [6].