Workflow
CRISPR/Cas12a
icon
Search documents
Editas Medicine Announces U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Reaffirms its Prior Decision in Favor of the Broad Institute in CRISPR/Cas9 Interference
Globenewswire· 2026-03-27 11:00
Core Viewpoint - Editas Medicine, Inc. has received a favorable reaffirmation from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office regarding its intellectual property rights related to CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, reinforcing its position in the gene editing market [1][2][3] Patent Interference and Legal Context - The patent interference case involves a dispute between the Broad Institute and the CVC group (University of California, University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier) over the inventorship of CRISPR/Cas9 technology [1][2] - This decision marks the third ruling by the PTAB affirming that the Broad Institute was the first to invent CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing in eukaryotic cells, including human cells [2] Company Developments and Products - Editas Medicine is focused on leveraging its intellectual property to develop transformative medicines, including EDIT-401, which has shown over 90% mean LDL cholesterol reduction in non-human primates [3] - The company holds exclusive licenses for CRISPR/Cas9 patents, which are crucial for the development and commercialization of its gene editing-based therapies [3][5] Intellectual Property Portfolio - Editas Medicine's foundational intellectual property encompasses patents for both CRISPR/Cas9 and CRISPR/Cas12a gene editing technologies applicable to human cells across multiple jurisdictions, including the U.S., Australia, Europe, Japan, and China [5] - The patents involved in the current interference do not affect other in-licensed patents from the Broad Institute and collaborators related to CRISPR/Cas12a [4]
Editas Medicine Announces U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Remands CRISPR Patent Interference to Patent Trial and Appeal Board
GlobeNewswire News Room· 2025-05-12 20:01
Core Viewpoint - Editas Medicine, Inc. announced a partial affirmation and partial vacate of a previous decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding patent interference related to CRISPR/Cas9 editing, with the case remanded back to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for further review [1] Group 1: Legal and Patent Developments - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part the PTAB's decision regarding patents for CRISPR/Cas9 editing in human cells involving the University of California, University of Vienna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and the Broad Institute [1] - Editas Medicine's in-licensed patents covering CRISPR/Cas12a are not affected by this decision and are not involved in the ongoing interference proceedings [1] Group 2: Company Strategy and Intellectual Property - The company remains confident in the strength of its intellectual property (IP) portfolio, which is expected to generate significant value now and in the future [2] - Editas holds a large portfolio of foundational U.S. and international patents, including exclusive licenses for Cas9 and Cas12a patent estates, which are crucial for developing human medicines [2] - The foundational IP includes issued patents covering fundamental aspects of CRISPR/Cas12a and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in all human cells, essential for CRISPR-based medicines [2] Group 3: Company Mission and Focus - Editas Medicine is focused on translating the potential of CRISPR/Cas12a and CRISPR/Cas9 systems into a pipeline of in vivo medicines for serious diseases [3] - The company aims to discover, develop, manufacture, and commercialize transformative gene editing medicines for a broad class of diseases [3]