Core Points - Meta achieved a legal victory against the memoir "Careless People" written by former Facebook executive Sarah Wynn-Williams [1][4] - An emergency arbitrator's decision prohibits Wynn-Williams from promoting the book and making disparaging comments about Meta [2][4] - The ruling was issued by the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, part of the American Arbitration Association [1] Company Response - A Meta spokesperson stated that the book is "false and defamatory" and should not have been published [2][4] - Despite the ruling, the book remains available for purchase from major retailers like Amazon and Barnes and Noble [2] Ongoing Developments - Wynn-Williams and her publisher Macmillan did not respond to requests for comments regarding the situation [3]

Core Points - Meta is attempting to prevent the promotion of a memoir by former employee Sarah Wynn-Williams, which contains allegations of sexual harassment against the company's policy chief [1][3] - An emergency arbitrator ruled in favor of Meta, prohibiting Wynn-Williams from promoting her book "Careless People" and from making further disparaging remarks about the company [2][6][7] Group 1: Allegations and Company Response - Wynn-Williams' memoir details her experiences at Facebook from 2011 to 2017, including allegations of inappropriate comments made by Joel Kaplan, the current policy chief [3] - Meta has dismissed the claims in the memoir as outdated and false, asserting that Wynn-Williams was terminated for poor performance and toxic behavior [4][7] - The company claims that Wynn-Williams violated the non-disparagement terms of her severance agreement, prompting the emergency motion [8] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The emergency arbitrator found that Meta had a strong likelihood of success on its contractual non-disparagement claim against Wynn-Williams [6] - The arbitrator's ruling includes a prohibition on Wynn-Williams from further publishing or distributing the book and requires her to retract previous disparaging remarks [7] - The legal action was initiated after Wynn-Williams allegedly concealed her book project and rushed it to publication without standard fact-checking [7]