Core Viewpoint - A federal judge dismissed a class action lawsuit against Mondelez International regarding the labeling of Clif bars as "climate neutral certified," ruling that the labels were not misleading [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by plaintiff Cynthia Salguero, who accused Mondelez of greenwashing by labeling Zbars as "climate neutral," despite the manufacturing process emitting 54,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually, equivalent to the emissions from 12,596 gasoline-powered cars [2]. - The judge, U.S. District Judge Manish Shah, found that Mondelez did not claim the Zbars were climate neutral but rather that they were certified as such, highlighting a significant distinction [3]. - The lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice, meaning it cannot be refiled, and Salguero sought unspecified damages for alleged misstatements and violations of California consumer protection laws [4]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The ruling emphasizes the importance of accurate labeling and the distinction between certification and claims made by companies regarding environmental impact [3]. - The case is officially titled Salguero v Mondelez International Inc, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois [4].

A federal judge dismissed a proposed class action lawsuit accusing Mondelez International of deceiving consumers into overpaying for Clif bars that were labeled "climate neutral certified." ...