Field development solutions
Search documents
Jim Cramer Says “I Think That It’s Very Hard for SLB to Deliver Special Numbers”
Yahoo Finance· 2026-01-20 16:02
Group 1 - SLB N.V. is facing challenges due to a difficult macroeconomic environment, with OPEC+ supply increases and geopolitical uncertainty negatively impacting oil prices and upstream investment activity [2] - The company experienced revenue softness and margin pressure in its Reservoir Performance and Well Construction segments, despite strong contributions from Digital and Production Systems services [2] - There are medium-term tailwinds expected as national oil companies increase investment in long-cycle projects to counter anticipated production declines, positioning SLB as a leading oilfield services provider [2] Group 2 - Jim Cramer expressed caution regarding SLB's upcoming report, noting the current crude oil price below $60 per barrel may hinder the company's ability to deliver strong results [1] - Ariel Investments highlighted that SLB traded lower during the third quarter of 2025, reflecting the challenging market conditions [2] - The company is recognized for its unmatched scale and broad technical capabilities, which are essential for meeting rising global energy demand [2]
Jim Cramer Discusses SLB and Possibility of Oil Price Below $60
Yahoo Finance· 2025-10-14 17:22
Group 1 - SLB N.V. (NYSE:SLB) is highlighted in Jim Cramer's game plan, indicating its significance in the current market [1] - Cramer expresses a bearish outlook on oil prices, suggesting that oil could drop below $60, potentially reaching $55 [1] - SLB provides a range of services and technologies for the energy sector, including field development, hydrocarbon production, and carbon management [1] Group 2 - Cramer advises caution regarding SLB stock, indicating a preference against oil stocks and suggesting to "keep watching" without making a purchase [1] - The article suggests that certain AI stocks may present better investment opportunities with higher upside potential and lower downside risk compared to SLB [1]