Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation DALLAS, Oct. 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Sunoco LP (NYSE: SUN) ("Sunoco" or the "Partnership") announced today that the previously announced proposed acquisition of Parkland Corporation (TSX: PKI) ("Parkland") by Sunoco (the "Transaction") is expected to close on October 31, 2025, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions. Sunoco also announced that on November 3, 2025, the Common Units of SunocoCorp LLC ("SunocoCorp") that will be issued to Pa ...

Core Insights - Ultrapar Participações S.A. reported a significant increase in net income, with a 134% year-over-year rise to $215 million in the second quarter, driven by higher operating cash generation and successful project execution [2] - The company's recurring EBITDA rose by 15% to $306 million, while total revenue reached $34.1 billion, indicating strong financial performance [2] - Ultrapar's balance sheet remains robust, with net debt at $2.35 billion and a net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 1.9x [2] Business Developments - The completion of the acquisition of Hydrovias and the advancement of the railway branch construction have strengthened Ultrapar's logistics operations and supported its expansion strategy [3] - Despite these positive developments, Ultrapar faces operational challenges, including decreased volumes at Ipiranga and Ultragaz, potential increased competition from Petrobras in the LPG market, and regulatory uncertainties [4] - Ultrapar operates in various sectors, including lubrication services, convenience retail, LPG, and fuel distribution in Brazil [4]

Group 1: Core Business Overview - Enbridge and Energy Transfer operate in the North American midstream sector, owning energy infrastructure assets like pipelines that facilitate the movement of oil and natural gas [2] - The midstream sector is considered the most reliable segment of the energy industry due to its fee-driven business model, where companies collect fees regardless of commodity prices [2] - Energy Transfer has investments in a compression business and fuel distribution, while Enbridge diversifies into natural gas utilities and clean energy, aligning with its goal of adapting to changing energy needs [3][4] Group 2: Dividend Comparison - Energy Transfer offers a higher dividend yield of 6.7%, compared to Enbridge's 6.2%, representing an 8% increase in income for investors focused solely on yield [5] - Enbridge has a strong track record of increasing its dividend for 30 consecutive years, demonstrating reliability, while Energy Transfer cut its dividend in half during the pandemic [6][7] - Although Energy Transfer's dividend is currently higher than pre-pandemic levels, the cut during a critical time for investors highlights the importance of dividend consistency, where Enbridge is favored [7][9] Group 3: Long-term Investment Considerations - Enbridge's strategy of transitioning towards cleaner energy sources may appeal more to long-term investors compared to Energy Transfer's higher yield [4][8] - The reliability of Enbridge's dividend, despite a lower yield, makes it a more attractive option for conservative income investors who prioritize stability [9]