Core Viewpoint - An Argentine appeals court ruled that Google must pay approximately $12,500 to a man whose naked photograph was taken by a Google Street View car in his backyard, highlighting significant privacy concerns related to the company's practices [1][5][12]. Legal Ruling - The court found that Google committed a "serious error" by publishing the image, which was taken in a private space behind a tall wall [1][5]. - The initial dismissal of the case by a lower court was overturned, emphasizing that the image was captured within the confines of the man's home, constituting a blatant invasion of privacy [5][9]. Financial Implications - The court awarded the plaintiff approximately £9,300, equivalent to $12,500 USD, reflecting the humiliation caused by the exposure [5][12]. Privacy Protections - Argentina's constitution and privacy laws provide strong protections for personal dignity, even when individuals are partially visible from public spaces [9]. - The ruling may set a precedent for similar privacy claims in Latin America, where privacy protections are often more stringent than in the U.S. [13]. Google's Policies - The court referenced Google's policy of blurring faces and license plates as an acknowledgment of its responsibility to prevent harm, indicating that the company should have flagged the image in question [11][12]. - Google's Street View policy includes the use of advanced blurring technology and allows users to request additional removals [13].

Core Points - A court in Argentina has ordered Google to pay approximately $12,500 in compensation to a man whose naked image was captured by a Google Street View camera in his yard [3][4] - The man argued that the invasion of privacy caused him ridicule at work and among neighbors, as his house number and street name were also revealed [2][3] - The judges concluded that the man's dignity was violated, emphasizing that the image was taken within the confines of his home, behind a wall taller than average [4][5] Legal Context - A previous court dismissed the man's claim, stating he was responsible for being inappropriately dressed in his garden [3] - Appeals judges found that Google had a responsibility to avoid such intrusions, highlighting the company's policy of blurring faces and license plates in Street View images [5][4] - The court also absolved other parties, such as a telecom company and a news site, from liability for the image's dissemination, indicating that their actions merely highlighted Google's error [7]