A Baltimore jury ordered Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries to pay over $1.5 billion to a woman who claimed decades of exposure to asbestos in the company’s talc-based products caused her peritoneal mesothelioma, a form of cancer.Jurors in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Md., on Monday found the company, two of its subsidiaries and spinoff Kenvue liable for failing to warn plaintiff Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos.Johnson & Johnson said it will appeal the jury’s decision, whic ...

A Baltimore jury ordered Johnson & Johnson and its subsidiaries to pay over $1.5 billion to a woman who claimed decades of exposure to asbestos in the company’s talc-based products caused her peritoneal mesothelioma, a form of cancer.Jurors in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Maryland, on Monday found the company, two of its subsidiaries and spinoff Kenvue liable for failing to warn plaintiff Cherie Craft that its baby powder contained asbestos. Johnson & Johnson said it will appeal the jury’s decision ...

A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million last week to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos. Johnson & Johnson said ...

Core Viewpoint - A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million to a plaintiff who claimed that Johnson & Johnson's talcum products, which may have been contaminated with asbestos, contributed to her developing mesothelioma, a type of cancer affecting the lungs [1][2]. Legal Proceedings - Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the jury's verdict, asserting that their baby powder is safe and does not contain asbestos [2][3]. - The trial lasted 13 days, during which the plaintiff's legal team argued that the company marketed talc-based products despite knowing the potential for asbestos contamination [2][4]. Company Response - Johnson & Johnson's vice president of litigation stated that the company's baby powder is safe and does not cause cancer, expressing confidence that the appellate court will reverse the decision [3][5]. - The company has faced ongoing legal challenges regarding the safety of its talc products, with previous cases resulting in significant awards against the company [4][6]. Industry Context - Johnson & Johnson ceased the sale of talc-based powder products globally in 2023, following mounting legal pressures and health concerns [4]. - Recent jury awards in similar cases highlight a trend of significant financial liabilities for the company related to claims of cancer caused by its talcum products [6].

Core Viewpoint - A Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who allege that Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer, marking a significant development in ongoing litigation against the company [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Developments - The recent verdict is part of a long-standing legal battle regarding claims that talc in Johnson & Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder is linked to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma [2]. - In October, another California jury ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died from mesothelioma, asserting that her cancer was due to asbestos contamination in the baby powder [3]. - The latest jury awarded $18 million to Monica Kent and $22 million to Deborah Schultz and her husband, highlighting the plaintiffs' long-term loyalty to the brand [4]. Group 2: Company Response and Strategy - Johnson & Johnson plans to appeal the jury's liability verdict and compensatory damages, asserting that it has won 16 out of 17 ovarian cancer cases previously tried [4]. - The company maintains that the jury's findings contradict decades of independent scientific evaluations that confirm talc is safe, does not contain asbestos, and does not cause cancer [5]. - In response to declining sales, Johnson & Johnson replaced talc in its baby powder with cornstarch in 2020 and faced a setback in April when a U.S. bankruptcy court judge denied its plan to pay $9 billion to settle related litigation claims [5].

Core Points - Dr. Casaretto, a long-time medical professional, used Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder daily and later developed malignant mesothelioma, leading to his death in December 2022 [1][2] - His case provides a significant exposure history in talc litigation, with experts finding asbestos in his product despite no known asbestos exposure in his career [2] - Allegations against Johnson & Johnson claim that their talc products, marketed as "gentle" and "safe," were contaminated with asbestos, and the company concealed these risks for decades [3]

Core Viewpoint - A jury awarded $20 million to the family of Dr. Alberto A. Casaretto, determining that Johnson & Johnson's talc-based products caused his fatal mesothelioma, highlighting corporate accountability for unsafe consumer products [1][7]. Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by Dr. Casaretto's son, alleging that Johnson & Johnson's talc was contaminated with asbestos and that the company failed to warn consumers about the risks [1][2]. - Dr. Casaretto used the talc-based products for decades, believing them to be "pure" and "safe," while evidence showed the company was aware of the asbestos risk but continued to market the products as safe [2][7]. Legal Commentary - Plaintiff counsel emphasized that the verdict represents justice for families unaware of the dangers in Johnson's Baby Powder and reflects a demand for corporate accountability [4]. - The verdict is seen as a significant step against decades of corporate concealment, with the jury's decision underscoring the need for manufacturers to ensure product safety and transparency [4]. Company Accountability - Internal documents and expert testimony revealed that Johnson & Johnson knew about the asbestos risk in talc and chose inadequate testing protocols, opting not to replace talc with safer alternatives [7]. - The $20 million award is a compensatory damage reflecting the jury's recognition of the long-term health ramifications of the company's products [7]. Background Information - Dr. Casaretto was a physician in Florida who passed away in 2022 from malignant pleural mesothelioma, with evidence linking his illness to the use of Johnson & Johnson's talc products [7]. - Levin Papantonio, the law firm representing the plaintiff, has a history of handling mass torts and has secured over $80 billion in jury verdicts and settlements against major corporations [8].

Group 1 - Kenvue experienced a significant sell-off of over 13% due to potential legal issues, contrasting with a smaller 0.6% decrease in the S&P 500 [1] - The company, previously part of Johnson & Johnson, is facing a lawsuit related to its Johnson's Baby Powder, which has been linked to cancer allegations [2][3] - The lawsuit in the U.K. involves approximately 3,000 claimants and targets both Kenvue and Johnson & Johnson [3] Group 2 - Kenvue's response to the lawsuit indicates that it does not believe the claims regarding the talc-based powder causing cancer will be upheld in court [4] - The company has inherited a long-standing legal controversy from its parent company, which includes the contentious product Johnson's Baby Powder [6]

Core Viewpoint - Johnson & Johnson (J&J) stock has increased by 4.4% over the past six months, adding over $15 billion to its market value, despite facing several challenges including slowing sales in the MedTech segment and the loss of exclusivity for its drug Stelara [1][2]. Group 1: Business Performance - J&J's Innovative Medicine unit is a key growth area, with sales rising 4.4% in Q1 2025 despite the loss of exclusivity for Stelara, driven by products like Darzalex and new drug launches [5][9]. - The company expects to generate over $57 billion in sales from the Innovative Medicines segment in 2025, with anticipated growth of 5-7% from 2025 to 2030 [6][7]. - J&J's diversified business model, with over 275 subsidiaries and 26 platforms generating annual sales exceeding $1 billion, helps it withstand economic cycles [3]. Group 2: Challenges and Risks - The loss of U.S. patent exclusivity for Stelara in 2025, which generated $10.36 billion in sales in 2024, is expected to significantly impact J&J's sales and profits, with Stelara sales declining by 33.7% in Q1 2025 [8][9]. - Sales in J&J's MedTech segment are facing headwinds, particularly in China due to government cost-containment efforts and competitive pressures [12][13]. - J&J is dealing with over 62,000 lawsuits related to its talc-based products, which could create ongoing legal and financial challenges [14][15]. Group 3: Market Position and Valuation - J&J's stock has outperformed the industry, rising 5.3% year-to-date compared to a 1.2% decline for the industry [16]. - The stock is reasonably priced, trading at a price/earnings ratio of 13.9, lower than the industry average of 14.82 [20]. - The Zacks Consensus Estimate for 2025 earnings remains unchanged at $10.60 per share, while the estimate for 2026 has slightly decreased [23]. Group 4: Future Outlook - J&J considers 2025 a "catalyst year," expecting stronger growth in the second half of the year driven by new product launches and pipeline momentum [26][27]. - The company has been active in acquisitions, including the recent purchase of Intra-Cellular Therapies, enhancing its presence in the neurological and psychiatric drug market [27]. - J&J has increased its quarterly dividend by 4.8%, marking the 63rd consecutive year of dividend increases, indicating confidence in its long-term growth [28].

Core Viewpoint - Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is facing multiple challenges including declining sales in its MedTech segment, loss of exclusivity for its drug Stelara, and ongoing talc lawsuits, while also navigating a volatile macroeconomic environment [1][2][26] Company Strengths and Weaknesses - J&J's diversified business model is a significant strength, operating through pharmaceuticals and medical devices with over 275 subsidiaries, which helps it withstand economic cycles [4] - The separation of its Consumer Health business into Kenvue allows J&J to focus on its core pharmaceutical and medical device operations [5] Innovative Medicine Unit - J&J's Innovative Medicine unit is experiencing growth, with sales increasing by 4.4% in Q1 2025 despite the loss of exclusivity for Stelara [6] - The company anticipates generating over $57 billion in sales from the Innovative Medicines segment in 2025, with expected growth of 5-7% from 2025 to 2030 [7] - J&J has identified 10 new products with potential peak sales of $5 billion, including cancer drugs and pipeline candidates [8] Patent Expiration and Sales Impact - The loss of U.S. patent exclusivity for Stelara in 2025 is expected to significantly impact sales, which were $10.36 billion in 2024, with a projected decline of 33.7% in Q1 2025 [9][10] - The introduction of biosimilars is anticipated to further erode Stelara's sales throughout 2025 [11] MedTech Segment Challenges - J&J's MedTech sales are facing headwinds, particularly in the Asia Pacific region, with challenges from China's volume-based procurement program and competitive pressures [12][13] - No improvement is expected in the Asia Pacific region for 2025, with ongoing impacts from the VBP program [13] Legal Issues - J&J is dealing with over 62,000 lawsuits related to its talc-based products, which allege that these products contain asbestos [14] - A bankruptcy court recently rejected J&J's proposed plan to settle these lawsuits, forcing the company to revert to traditional legal proceedings [15] Stock Performance and Valuation - J&J's stock has outperformed the industry year-to-date, rising 6.8% compared to a 2.7% decline in the industry [16] - The stock is reasonably priced with a price/earnings ratio of 14.25, slightly below the industry average of 14.79 [19] Future Outlook - J&J considers 2025 a "catalyst year" for growth, expecting operational sales growth to accelerate in the second half of the year [24] - The company has a promising R&D pipeline and has recently made acquisitions to strengthen its market position [25]