Workflow
Lake Charles LNG project
icon
Search documents
Energy Transfer Stock Is Cheap, but Does That Make It a Buy Now?
The Motley Fool· 2025-10-05 07:33
Core Viewpoint - Energy Transfer is currently undervalued in the market, trading at a low valuation compared to its peers, despite having a strong financial position and potential growth catalysts ahead [1][7][6]. Valuation and Financial Performance - Energy Transfer's units have declined by over 10% this year, leading to a valuation of less than 9 times earnings, which is significantly lower than the peer average of around 12 times [1][4]. - The company expects earnings growth to be less than 4% this year, a slowdown from the 10% compound annual growth rate since 2020, primarily due to weaker commodity prices and fewer growth catalysts [3][8]. Financial Strength - Energy Transfer is in its strongest financial position in history, with a leverage ratio in the lower half of its target range of 4.0-4.5, indicating a solid financial profile compared to some peers [6]. Growth Catalysts - The company plans to invest $5 billion into growth capital projects in 2025, including the Nederland Flexport NGL expansion and Hugh Brinson Pipeline, which are expected to add meaningful incremental earnings by the end of 2026 [8]. - Additional expansion projects, such as the $5.3 billion Desert Southeast Expansion, are expected to be completed by the end of 2029, providing growth visibility into 2030 [9]. - Energy Transfer is also developing several projects to increase natural gas transportation capacity, particularly to support growing demand from AI data centers [10]. Acquisition Potential - The company has a history of consolidating the energy midstream sector and has the financial strength to pursue acquisitions, which could further enhance its valuation [11]. Investment Opportunity - Despite the current slowdown in growth, Energy Transfer is viewed as a compelling investment opportunity due to its attractive valuation and the potential for growth from ongoing and future projects [12].
Energy Transfer: Is This High-Yield Stock a Buy as Growth Projects Pile Up?
The Motley Fool· 2025-08-10 22:41
Core Viewpoint - Energy Transfer is entering a new growth phase with a significant backlog of attractive projects, which is expected to drive solid growth in the coming years [2][10]. Growth Projects - The company announced a new $5.3 billion natural gas pipeline project, the Desert Southwest pipeline, which will transport 1.5 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) from the Permian to Arizona and New Mexico, expected to be completed by the end of 2029 [3]. - Phase 1 of the Hugh Brinson Pipeline, also with a capacity of 1.5 Bcf/d, is anticipated to come online by the end of 2026, with Phase 2 allowing for 2.2 Bcf/d transport from west to east and 1 Bcf/d from east to west [4]. - The company is making progress on the Lake Charles LNG project, having found a partner in MidOcean Energy and signed several offtake agreements, with plans to own about 25% of the project [4]. Financial Performance - In Q2, Energy Transfer's adjusted EBITDA grew by 3% year over year to $3.87 billion, while distributable cash flow (DCF) to partners fell by 1% to $1.96 billion [6]. - The company experienced volume increases across its systems, including an 11% rise in interstate natural gas volumes and a 10% increase in midstream gathered volumes [7]. Future Outlook - The company expects its full-year EBITDA to be at or slightly below the low end of its guidance range of $16.1 billion to $16.5 billion [8]. - Energy Transfer anticipates a mid-teens return on its growth projects, which are expected to provide a strong runway for growth in the coming years [10]. Distribution and Valuation - The company has a robust coverage ratio of 1.7 times for its Q2 distribution, with plans to grow its distribution by 3% to 5% annually [11]. - Approximately 90% of its 2025 EBITDA is expected to come from fee-based operations, contributing to a stable business model [12]. - The stock trades at a forward enterprise value (EV)-to-EBITDA multiple of 8.1 times, which is low compared to its MLP peers and historical averages [12].