Core Viewpoint - The Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) is a passively managed fund designed to provide broad exposure to the Large Cap Blend segment of the US equity market, with assets exceeding $4.39 billion, making it one of the larger ETFs in this category [1] Group 1: Fund Overview - SCHK was launched on October 11, 2017, and is sponsored by Charles Schwab [1] - The fund targets large cap companies, typically with market capitalizations above $10 billion, offering a stable investment option with less risk compared to mid and small cap companies [2] Group 2: Costs and Performance - The ETF has an annual operating expense ratio of 0.03%, positioning it as one of the least expensive options in the market, with a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.14% [3] - As of July 22, 2025, SCHK has returned approximately 7.79% year-to-date and 16.16% over the past year, with a trading range between $23.87 and $30.35 in the last 52 weeks [7] Group 3: Sector Exposure and Holdings - The ETF has a significant allocation to the Information Technology sector, comprising about 32.70% of the portfolio, followed by Financials and Consumer Discretionary [4] - Nvidia Corp (NVDA) is the largest holding at approximately 6.84% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 33.49% of total assets under management [5] Group 4: Index and Risk Metrics - SCHK aims to match the performance of the Schwab 1000 Index, which includes the 1,000 largest publicly traded companies in the U.S., weighted by market capitalization [6] - The ETF has a beta of 1.02 and a standard deviation of 17.14% over the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification with about 986 holdings [7] Group 5: Alternatives - SCHK carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Large Cap Blend market segment [8] - Other alternatives include the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) and the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO), which have significantly larger asset bases of $646.63 billion and $694.54 billion, respectively [9]