Workflow
Socrates
icon
Search documents
EPD vs. WMB: Which Midstream Energy Giant Boasts Better Prospects?
ZACKS· 2025-06-24 15:21
Core Insights - Williams Companies (WMB) has outperformed Enterprise Products Partners (EPD) in the past year, with a stock increase of 45.5% compared to EPD's 14.3% and the industry's 33.4% growth [1][3]. Company Performance - WMB is expanding its midstream operations through well-planned infrastructure projects like the Southeast Energy Connector and the Power Express Pipeline, which are either operational or in advanced stages [4]. - The Socrates project is a key initiative for WMB, designed to supply natural gas power to data centers, with a secured 10-year contract ensuring predictable income [5]. - WMB's projects are fully contracted before completion, reducing financial risk and ensuring stable cash flows [5]. Financial Strength - WMB has received credit upgrades, with S&P raising its rating to BBB+ and Moody's providing a positive outlook, reflecting strong profit margins and a solid business outlook [9][10]. - In contrast, EPD has not received recent upgrades or improved outlooks from credit agencies, indicating that WMB is currently viewed as financially stronger [10]. Valuation Metrics - WMB is trading at a trailing 12-month EV/EBITDA of 17.59x, which is a premium compared to the industry average of 13.95x and EPD's 10.03x [11]. - Despite WMB's positive long-term outlook, uncertainties in the energy business environment may affect investment decisions [12]. Earnings Estimates - EPD's outlook is less favorable, with its projects focused on gathering and processing fuel, which will take longer to generate profits compared to WMB [13]. - EPD has experienced downward revisions in earnings estimates for 2025 and 2026, indicating potential challenges ahead [13].
Williams Companies Q1 Earnings Beat Estimates, Expenses Rise Y/Y
ZACKS· 2025-05-08 10:40
Core Insights - The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) reported first-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of 60 cents, exceeding the Zacks Consensus Estimate of 55 cents and increasing from 59 cents in the prior year [1] - Revenues for the quarter were $3 billion, missing the Zacks Consensus Estimate by $93 million, but up from $2.8 billion year-over-year, driven by increased service revenues and product sales [2] - Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter totaled $1.9 billion, reflecting a 2.8% year-over-year increase, supported by growth in natural gas demand and contributions from acquisitions and expansion projects [4] Segment Performance - Transmission & Gulf of Mexico segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $862 million, up 2.7% year-over-year, but below the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $898 million due to higher costs [5] - West segment's adjusted EBITDA was $354 million, a 7.9% increase from $328 million in the prior year, but below the consensus estimate of $366 million due to lower gathering volumes [6] - Northeast G&P segment achieved adjusted EBITDA of $514 million, up about 2% from $504 million, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate by 3.8% due to higher rates and volumes [7] - Gas & NGL Marketing Services reported adjusted EBITDA of $155 million, down from $189 million year-over-year, but above the consensus mark of $119 million [8] Financial Overview - Total costs and expenses for the quarter were $1.9 billion, an increase of nearly 11.1% from the previous year [10] - Total capital expenditure (Capex) was $1 billion, with cash and cash equivalents of $100 million and long-term debt of $24.1 billion, resulting in a debt-to-capitalization ratio of 61.9% [10] Future Guidance - The company raised its 2025 adjusted EBITDA forecast to $7.7 billion, indicating a $50 million increase to the guidance midpoint [11] - Capital expenditure plans for 2025 include growth Capex ranging from $2.575 billion to $2.875 billion and maintenance Capex between $650 million and $750 million [11] - The company improved its leverage ratio for 2025 to a midpoint of 3.65x and raised its dividend by 5.3% to $2 per share for 2025 [12]