enzalutamide

Search documents
Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) FY Conference Transcript
2025-06-10 15:00
Summary of Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) FY Conference Call Company Overview - **Company**: Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) - **Industry**: Clinical stage oncology, focusing on small molecule treatments for solid tumors, specifically prostate cancer, lung cancer, and breast cancer [2][3] Key Programs and Pipeline - **ORIC-944**: An allosteric PRC2 inhibitor in combination with AR inhibitors for prostate cancer [3][4] - **ORC-114**: A brain-penetrant EGFR HER2 exon 20 inhibitor for non-small cell lung cancer mutations [4][63] Clinical Development and Data - **Upcoming Studies**: Plans to initiate two Phase III studies in 2026 for ORIC-944 and ORC-114 [4][88] - **Recent Data**: Initial data from a Phase 1b study showed a PSA 50 response of 47% and a PSA 90 response of 24% in combination with AR inhibitors, which is favorable compared to Pfizer's data [18][20] - **Safety Profile**: ORIC-944 demonstrated a lower incidence of treatment-related adverse events compared to Pfizer's PRC2 inhibitor, with a diarrhea rate of 53% and only one grade three event [19][20] Competitive Landscape - **Market Opportunity**: Prostate cancer represents a significant market with approximately 40,000 to 50,000 patients in metastatic CRPC annually [34] - **Comparison with Competitors**: ORIC-944 aims to differentiate itself from Pfizer's mebrometostat by having a longer half-life (20 hours vs. 2 hours) and a potentially better safety profile [12][33][34] - **Other Competitors**: Awareness of several other PRC2 inhibitors in development, including those from Novartis and various companies in China, which may not be optimized for prostate cancer [40][41] Future Expectations and Updates - **Next Updates**: Anticipated updates on ORIC-944 in the second half of 2025, with a focus on PSA response and safety [51][56] - **Phase III Study Timeline**: Expected to start the Phase III study for ORIC-944 in the first half of 2026 [57][88] Financial Position - **Recent Financing**: Raised $125 million in a PIPE financing, extending cash runway into the second half of 2027 [88] - **Cash Management**: The cash runway includes funding for both assets and assumes no strategic partnerships, covering all costs associated with the upcoming Phase III studies [88] Additional Insights - **Combination Studies**: ORIC-114 is being studied in combination with amivantamab, which may provide synergistic effects due to its unique mechanism of action [80][84] - **Patient Population**: ORIC's studies allow for patients with active metastases, which is a differentiating factor compared to other trials that have stringent inclusion criteria [67][72] This summary encapsulates the key points discussed during the conference call, highlighting Oric Pharmaceuticals' strategic focus, clinical advancements, competitive positioning, and financial outlook.
Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) 2025 Conference Transcript
2025-06-04 17:50
Summary of Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) 2025 Conference Call Company Overview - **Company Name**: Oric Pharmaceuticals (ORIC) - **Focus**: Development of small molecule drugs targeting solid tumors, specifically in lung cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer [4][5] Key Programs - **ORIC-944**: A PRC2 inhibitor for prostate cancer, currently in combination studies with two androgen receptor inhibitors (apalutamide and darolutamide) [5][6] - **ORIC-114**: A brain-penetrant inhibitor targeting lung cancer populations, including EGFR exon 20, EGFR atypicals, and HER2 exon 20 [6] Clinical Data and Comparisons - **Prostate Cancer Data**: - ORIC-944 showed a confirmed PSA 50 response rate of 47% compared to Pfizer's mevremetostat at 34% [10][13] - Confirmed PSA 90 response rate for ORIC-944 was 24% versus Pfizer's 12% [11][13] - Safety profile of ORIC-944 demonstrated lower rates of gastrointestinal toxicity compared to Pfizer's drug [14][15] Safety and Efficacy - **Toxicity Comparison**: ORIC-944 exhibited significantly lower rates of GI toxicity and anemia compared to Pfizer's data, which reported high rates of diarrhea and dysgeusia [14][15] - **Dosing Strategy**: ORIC-944 has a longer half-life allowing for once-daily dosing, while Pfizer's drug requires twice-daily dosing [26][27] Future Development Plans - **Phase III Study**: Planned to start in the first half of 2026, focusing on both post-abiraterone and post-AR inhibitor populations [33][44] - **Data Updates**: Two additional data updates expected later in 2025, focusing on dose escalation and optimization [34][36] Market Position and Strategy - **Competitive Landscape**: ORIC aims to close the timeline gap with Pfizer, emphasizing that being a second entrant in a large market can still yield significant commercial opportunities [60][61] - **Partnerships**: Strong relationships with Janssen and Bayer for drug supply and insights into clinical development [51][52] Financial Position - **Cash Position**: As of March, ORIC reported a pro forma cash position of $349 million, providing a runway into the second half of 2027 [73] Additional Insights - **ctDNA as a Biomarker**: ORIC is exploring ctDNA as a potential better marker for long-term durability compared to PSA activity [40][41] - **Focus on Frontline Opportunities**: ORIC is prioritizing frontline strategies for ORIC-114, aiming for robust data in competitive populations [63][64] Conclusion - ORIC Pharmaceuticals is positioned to advance its clinical programs with promising early data, a strong financial position, and strategic partnerships, while navigating a competitive landscape in oncology.
EPIX Deadline: EPIX Investors Have Opportunity to Lead ESSA Pharma Inc. Securities Fraud Lawsuit
Prnewswire· 2025-03-13 22:18
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased securities of ESSA Pharma Inc. during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased ESSA Pharma securities between December 12, 2023, and October 31, 2024, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2][5]. - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is March 25, 2025 [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in litigation [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that ESSA Pharma failed to disclose critical information regarding the efficacy of masofaniten in combination with enzalutamide, leading to misleading public statements [4]. - Specific claims include that the combination treatment had no clear efficacy benefit over enzalutamide alone and was less effective in treating prostate cancer than previously stated [4]. - The lawsuit asserts that the M-E Combination Study was unlikely to meet its primary endpoint, resulting in overstated clinical and commercial prospects for masofaniten [4].
The Gross Law Firm Notifies Shareholders of ESSA Pharma Inc.(EPIX) of a Class Action Lawsuit and an Upcoming Deadline
Prnewswire· 2025-02-27 10:45
Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of ESSA Pharma Inc. regarding a class action lawsuit due to alleged misleading statements related to the efficacy of masofaniten in combination with enzalutamide for prostate cancer treatment [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations - The complaint alleges that during the class period from December 12, 2023, to October 31, 2024, the defendants made materially false and misleading statements about masofaniten's efficacy [2]. - It is claimed that masofaniten in combination with enzalutamide did not demonstrate a clear efficacy benefit over enzalutamide alone, contrary to what was communicated to investors [2]. - The M-E Combination Study was unlikely to meet its prespecified Phase 2 primary endpoint, indicating that the clinical and commercial prospects of masofaniten were overstated [2]. Group 2: Class Action Details - The deadline for shareholders to register for the class action is March 25, 2025, and they are encouraged to register without delay [3]. - Once registered, shareholders will receive updates through a portfolio monitoring software regarding the status of the case [3]. - There is no cost or obligation for shareholders to participate in this class action [3]. Group 3: Law Firm Background - The Gross Law Firm is a nationally recognized class action law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of investors affected by deceit and fraud [4]. - The firm aims to ensure that companies adhere to responsible business practices and seeks recovery for investors who suffered losses due to misleading statements [4].