LOS ANGELES, Sept. 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP reminds investors of the upcoming October 28, 2025 deadline to file a lead plaintiff motion in the class action filed on behalf of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Dow Inc. (“Dow” or the “Company”) (NYSE: DOW) securities between January 30, 2025 and July 23, 2025, inclusive (the “Class Period”). IF YOU SUFFERED A LOSS ON YOUR DOW INVESTMENTS, CLICK HERE TO INQUIRE ABOUT POTENTIALLY PURSUING CLAIMS TO RECOVER YOUR LOSS U ...

Group 1 - The article discusses a securities fraud class action lawsuit against Dow Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [2][3] - The lawsuit claims that Dow misrepresented its ability to handle macroeconomic challenges and maintain financial flexibility for dividends [3] - Investors who purchased Dow securities between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, are eligible to participate in the lawsuit [2] Group 2 - A deadline for filing as a lead plaintiff in the class action is set for October 28, 2025 [4] - The law firm Bernstein Liebhard LLP has a history of recovering over $3.5 billion for clients and has been recognized for its litigation success [5]

Core Viewpoint - The content emphasizes the importance of conducting personal due diligence and consulting competent advisors before making any financial decisions, particularly in the context of investments and trading activities [1]. Group 1 - The website provides general news, personal analysis, and third-party content intended for educational and research purposes [1]. - It explicitly states that the information does not constitute any recommendation or advice for investment actions [1]. - Users are advised to perform their own research and consider their financial situation before making decisions [1]. Group 2 - The website includes information about complex financial instruments such as cryptocurrencies and contracts for difference (CFDs), which carry a high risk of losing money [1]. - It encourages users to understand how these instruments work and the associated risks before investing [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights three established companies—Coca-Cola, Procter & Gamble, and Sherwin-Williams—as reliable dividend stocks that can enhance passive income for investors, especially in the current market environment [2][20]. Coca-Cola - Coca-Cola has a strong history of dividend payments, having raised its dividend for 63 consecutive years, earning it the title of Dividend King [8]. - The company is currently experiencing solid organic growth and is diversifying its product lineup towards healthier options, such as Coca-Cola Zero Sugar and Diet Coke [7]. - Coca-Cola's stock is trading at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 23.6, below its 10-year median P/E of 27.7, and offers a dividend yield of 3.1% [8]. Procter & Gamble - Procter & Gamble is facing challenges due to inflation and cost-of-living pressures affecting consumers, which has led to its stock hovering around a 52-week low [9][10]. - The company has announced a restructuring plan that includes cutting 7,000 jobs and exiting certain brands and markets [10]. - P&G has a P/E ratio of 23.4 and a forward P/E of 21.8, with a dividend yield of 2.8%, making it appealing for risk-averse investors [14]. Sherwin-Williams - Sherwin-Williams has underperformed major indexes this year due to high interest rates impacting its end markets, but it has a strong history of dividend increases, with 46 consecutive years of raises [15][17]. - The company has a solid business model, selling products through various channels, and has seen its stock price increase by 352% over the last decade [17][18]. - Sherwin-Williams is considered a good buy for long-term investors, despite its current dividend yield of only 0.9% [17][18]. Investment Appeal - All three companies are characterized by their ability to pay growing and reliable dividends, making them suitable for investors looking for non-tech-focused investment opportunities [20]. - Coca-Cola and Procter & Gamble are currently trading at discounted valuations compared to their historical averages, while Sherwin-Williams is in line with its 10-year median valuation [20].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. for allegedly making false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges during the specified Class Period from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit is on behalf of investors who purchased Dow securities during the Class Period, with a lead plaintiff deadline set for October 28, 2025 [1][4]. - The complaint alleges that Dow overstated its ability to mitigate macroeconomic and tariff-related headwinds, which negatively impacted its business and financial condition [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Dow - The allegations include that Dow failed to disclose the true scope and severity of competitive and pricing pressures, softening global sales, and an oversupply of products in its markets [3]. - It is claimed that the public statements made by Dow were materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [3]. Group 3: Legal Representation - Investors may seek to be appointed as lead plaintiff representatives through Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check, LLP or choose to remain absent class members [4]. - The lead plaintiff will act on behalf of all class members and select counsel to represent the class in the litigation [4].

NEW YORK, Sept. 28, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Dow Inc. (NYSE: DOW) between January 30, 2025 and July 23, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important October 28, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Dow securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. WHAT TO DO NEXT: ...

Group 1: Market Overview - The Dow Jones Industrial Average is filled with industry-leading companies, many of which pay dividends, but dividend-paying companies are currently out of favor as mega-cap growth stocks drive market gains [1][2] - The S&P 500 has increased by 73% since the start of 2023, making the appeal of dividend yields less attractive [1] Group 2: Honeywell International - Honeywell is planning to split into three stand-alone publicly traded companies, with the materials business expected to spin off later this year or early next year [4] - The company trades at under 20 times forward earnings and has a dividend yield of 2.2%, making it an attractive buy for long-term investors [6] - Honeywell's performance has been decent, but its corporate structure has hindered its ability to capitalize on industry growth trends [6] Group 3: Nike - Nike has faced challenges due to consumer spending pullbacks and competition from newer brands in the athleisure market [8][9] - The company has made leadership changes to improve its performance, and its dividend yield has increased to 2.3%, providing an incentive for investors to hold [10] - Nike's shift to direct-to-consumer sales faced pushback from wholesale partners, indicating the need for a balanced approach in its business strategy [9] Group 4: Salesforce - Salesforce has seen a 26.5% decline year-to-date, raising concerns about its ability to monetize artificial intelligence and compete in the SaaS market [11][12] - The company has introduced AI tools under its Agentforce lineup, but its forward P/E ratio of 21.7 suggests it may be undervalued compared to its previous premium [12] - Salesforce initiated its first-ever dividend in early 2024, with a modest 4% increase, but its yield remains low at 0.7% [13] Group 5: Investment Opportunities - Honeywell, Nike, and Salesforce present opportunities for contrarian investors seeking value in a premium-priced market [14] - Honeywell is considered the best buy due to its decent performance and potential post-breakup growth [15] - Nike is viewed as a solid investment for those who believe in the brand's resilience, while Salesforce is a riskier bet for investors confident in its competitive position against AI [15]

Core Viewpoint - The law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has announced a class action lawsuit against Dow Inc. for alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, with a focus on misleading statements regarding the company's financial health and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges during the specified class period from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Performance - The lawsuit claims that Dow overstated its ability to handle macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, as well as its financial flexibility to support dividends [4]. - It is alleged that Dow's business faced significant negative impacts from competitive pressures, declining global sales, and an oversupply of products [4]. - On June 23, 2025, BMO Capital downgraded Dow's stock from "Market Perform" to "Underperform," reducing the price target from $29.00 to $22.00, which led to a stock price drop of over 3% [5]. - Dow reported a non-GAAP loss per share of $0.42 for Q2 2025, significantly worse than the expected loss of approximately $0.17 to $0.18, with net sales of $10.1 billion, a 7.3% year-over-year decline [6]. - Following the disappointing earnings report, Dow's stock price fell by more than 17% after announcing a dividend cut from $0.70 to $0.35 per share [6]. Group 2: Class Action Process - Investors who purchased Dow securities during the class period can seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit, which allows them to act on behalf of all class members [7]. - The lead plaintiff can choose a law firm to represent the class, and participation as lead plaintiff does not affect the ability to share in any potential recovery [7]. Group 3: About the Law Firm - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is a leading law firm specializing in securities fraud and shareholder litigation, having secured over $2.5 billion for investors in 2024 alone [8]. - The firm has been recognized for obtaining significant recoveries in securities class action cases, including the largest recovery in history of $7.2 billion in the Enron case [9].

NO COST TO YOU: If you are a class member, you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out-of-pocket costs or fees. There is no cost or obligation to participate. Accessibility StatementSkip Navigation NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Dow Inc. ("Dow Inc." or the "Company") (NYSE: DOW) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Dow Inc. investors who were adversely affected by alle ...

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Dow Inc. securities between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 28, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Dow securities during the specified class period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the court to serve as lead plaintiff by the deadline [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Dow made false and misleading statements regarding its financial flexibility and the impact of macroeconomic factors on its business [4]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time, and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements since 2013 [3]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3].