IVZ currently has a forward P/E ratio of 12.15, while TPG has a forward P/E of 28.82. We also note that IVZ has a PEG ratio of 1.18. This popular metric is similar to the widely-known P/E ratio, with the difference being that the PEG ratio also takes into account the company's expected earnings growth rate. TPG currently has a PEG ratio of 1.48. Another notable valuation metric for IVZ is its P/B ratio of 0.65. Investors use the P/B ratio to look at a stock's market value versus its book value, which is def ...

Core Insights - The Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) provides broad exposure to the Financials - Insurance segment and is passively managed, launched on December 2, 2010 [1] - The ETF has gained popularity among retail and institutional investors due to its low costs, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency, making it suitable for long-term investment [1] Fund Overview - Sponsored by Invesco, KBWP has assets exceeding $456.27 million, positioning it as an average-sized ETF in the Financials - Insurance segment [3] - The fund aims to match the performance of the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty Index, which includes approximately 24 property and casualty insurance companies [4] Cost Structure - The annual operating expenses for KBWP are 0.35%, categorizing it as one of the least expensive options in its category [5] - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 1.84% [5] Sector Exposure and Holdings - KBWP is fully allocated to the Financials sector, with about 100% of its portfolio dedicated to this area [6] - American International Group Inc (AIG) constitutes approximately 8.15% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings making up about 59.91% of total assets under management [7] Performance Metrics - The ETF has returned roughly 1.2% year-to-date and increased by about 10.73% over the past year, with a trading range between $104.61 and $126.65 in the last 52 weeks [8] - It has a beta of 0.57 and a standard deviation of 18.57% over the trailing three-year period, indicating medium risk [8] Alternatives - KBWP holds a Zacks ETF Rank of 2 (Buy), based on expected asset class return, expense ratio, and momentum [9] - Other ETFs in the space include iShares U.S. Insurance ETF (IAK) and SPDR S&P Insurance ETF (KIE), with assets of $731.29 million and $844.93 million respectively [10]

Report Industry Investment Rating No information provided in the report. Core Viewpoints of the Report - Last week in the US, 37 new ETF products were issued, with an acceleration in issuance, including products that both increase and decrease concentration. The factor rotation ETF had inflows of over $1 billion, and Bitcoin products outperformed Ethereum products. In May 2025, the total non - money public funds in the US increased, and from July 2nd to 9th, domestic stock funds had outflows while bond products had inflows [2]. Summary According to the Table of Contents 1. US ETF Innovation Products: Products with Increased and Decreased Concentration Issued Simultaneously - 37 new products were issued last week, involving series products from multiple companies. Direxion, Leverage Shares, etc. expanded single - stock leveraged and inverse products. WEBs issued the Defined Volatility series products. Invesco and Janus Henderson issued bond products. Crossmark issued large - cap growth and value ETFs, and Defiance issued an AI and power infrastructure ETF. Roundhill expanded its weekly leveraged + dividend ETFs [5][6][7]. - Xtrackers issued an industry - diversified product, SPXD, which tracks the S&P 500 Diversified Sector Weight Index and distributes weights based on sub - industry revenues. Its first - largest weighted stock is Berkshire Hathaway, with a weight of about 3.7%, and the weights of other stocks are below 2%. Global X issued the PureCap series products to address US regulatory restrictions on ETF shareholding ratios [8][11][12]. 2. US ETF Dynamics 2.1 US ETF Funds: Factor Rotation ETF Inflows Exceeded $1 Billion - Last week, stock ETFs had inflows of over $16 billion, with similar inflows for domestic and international stocks. Bond ETFs had more domestic inflows than international ones, and Bitcoin and commodity ETFs continued to have inflows. The factor rotation products had single - week inflows of over $1 billion and their current scale has exceeded $20 billion. The top out - flowing products were mainly S&P 500 ETFs from State Street and BlackRock [13][14]. 2.2 US ETF Performance: Bitcoin Products Outperformed Ethereum - Since the beginning of this year, the cryptocurrency market has attracted attention. The total scale of relevant US ETFs has exceeded $150 billion. The BlackRock Bitcoin ETF is close to $90 billion, and the BlackRock Ethereum ETF exceeds $10 billion. Bitcoin has a year - to - date increase of about 25%, while Ethereum products have an increase of less than 10%, and BlackRock's products have relatively good performance [17]. 3. Recent Capital Flows of US Ordinary Public Funds - In May 2025, the total non - money public funds in the US were $21.91 trillion, an increase of $0.85 trillion from April 2025. The S&P 500 rose 6.15% in May, and the scale of domestic US equity products increased by 5.49%, slightly lower than the stock increase. From July 2nd to 9th, domestic US stock funds had total outflows of about $7.5 billion, and bond product inflows expanded to $7.58 billion [21].

Report Summary 1. Report Industry Investment Rating No industry investment rating is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - The industry and market are increasingly focusing on multi - asset ETFs as an innovative product offering one - stop asset allocation solutions. The report explores the development of US multi - asset ETFs to provide insights for domestic market innovation [2][11]. - US multi - asset ETFs have shown significant growth in recent years, with distinct characteristics such as strong head - effects in scale, rapid development of actively managed products, and extensive application of FOF - type products [2][20][31]. - The development of US multi - asset ETFs offers important lessons for the domestic market, including deepening multi - asset index development, diversifying allocation strategies, and broadening underlying asset investment tools [5]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Two Action Plans Mentioned, Multi - asset ETFs Are Approaching - The "Public Offering Plan" emphasizes increasing the creation of asset - allocation products to meet the needs of investors with different risk preferences and promote the coordinated development of equity and fixed - income investments [8]. - The "Index Plan" proposes researching and launching innovative index products such as multi - asset ETFs and expanding the underlying asset categories of ETFs. Recent releases of multi - asset indices indicate growing market attention [10][11]. 3.2 Analysis of the Development History and Current Situation of US Multi - asset ETFs - In 2005, BlackRock issued the world's first multi - asset ETF in Canada. In 2006, Invesco launched the first US multi - asset ETF. After the 2008 financial crisis, multi - asset ETFs evolved rapidly [13][14]. - As of March 31, 2025, there are 181 multi - asset ETFs in the US market, with a total scale of $36 billion, ranking first globally. However, their scale accounts for only 0.35% of all US ETFs, indicating significant growth potential [18]. - The top three fund managers in terms of management scale are BlackRock, Pacer Advisors, and First Trust Portfolios, with a combined scale ratio of 45.35%. The top ten multi - asset ETFs in terms of fund scale account for 51.26% of the total scale [22][25]. - Actively managed multi - asset ETFs have developed rapidly. As of March 31, 2025, 146 out of 181 multi - asset ETFs are actively managed, accounting for 80.66%. Their issuance has increased explosively since 2021 [31]. - FOF - type products are widely used in US multi - asset ETFs. As of March 31, 2025, 73 out of 181 multi - asset ETFs are marked as FOF - type, accounting for nearly 40%, with a fund scale of $13.041 billion, about 36% of the total [34]. - The expense ratios of US multi - asset ETFs vary significantly. The average expense ratio of all 181 multi - asset ETFs is 0.80%, with actively managed and passively managed products having average expense ratios of 0.83% and 0.69% respectively. The expense ratio has generally remained low since 2016 [5][40]. 3.3 Exploration of the Strategy Classification of US Multi - asset ETFs - **Core Allocation Type**: This is the most common strategy type, further divided into target - risk, macro - strategy, and subjective - allocation subtypes. Target - risk type aims to meet pre - designed risk metrics, with 28 products and a scale of $8.176 billion. Macro - strategy type adjusts asset allocation based on macro - economic analysis, with 12 products and a scale of $0.937 billion. Subjective - allocation type gives investment managers high freedom, with 57 products and a scale of $10.402 billion [44][47][51]. - **Trend - Following Type**: These ETFs use momentum factors or trend - following models for asset allocation. As of March 31, 2025, there are 26 products with a scale of $7.193 billion, accounting for about 20% of the total [54][55]. - **Target - Dividend Type**: These ETFs focus on interest (dividend) income, with 22 products and a scale of $6.384 billion. The average historical dividend rate of 17 products issued before 2024 is 7.20%, much higher than other types [58][63]. - **Option - Strategy Type**: These ETFs add option - based derivatives to underlying assets to change the risk - return characteristics. As of March 31, 2025, there are 36 products with a scale of $2.907 billion, accounting for 8.08% of the total [63][64]. 3.4 Suggestions and Insights - **Investor Suggestions**: Different types of investors can choose corresponding multi - asset ETFs. For example, risk - sensitive investors can choose target - risk type; policy - sensitive investors can choose macro - strategy type; investors seeking stable cash flow can choose target - dividend type; those preferring quantitative strategies can choose trend - following type; and investors interested in alternative strategies can choose option - strategy type [68][69][70]. - **Insights for the Domestic Market**: The domestic market should prioritize using existing multi - asset indices as tracking targets, deepen the development of multi - asset indices, focus on stable strategies and diversify allocation strategies, and broaden underlying asset investment tools to promote the development of multi - asset ETFs [72][73][75].

Core Insights - The Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (NYSEARCA: EQWL) is highlighted as an attractive investment option due to the current macroeconomic environment characterized by stretched valuations and high concentration in major indices [1] Group 1: Investment Strategy - The focus is on equity valuation, market trends, and portfolio optimization to identify high-growth investment opportunities [1] - The approach combines rigorous risk management with a long-term perspective on value creation, emphasizing macroeconomic trends and corporate earnings [1] Group 2: Analyst Background - The analyst has over 20 years of experience in quantitative research, financial modeling, and risk management, with a background as a former Vice President at Barclays [1] - Expertise includes model validation, stress testing, and regulatory finance, providing a strong foundation for both fundamental and technical analysis [1]

Core Viewpoint - Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. reported a challenging second quarter in 2025, with a significant economic return of (4.8)%, driven by market volatility and a decline in book value per share, despite maintaining a consistent dividend payout. Financial Performance - The company experienced a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $26.6 million, translating to a loss per share of $0.40, compared to a net income of $16.3 million and earnings per share of $0.26 in Q1 2025 [10][11]. - Total interest income decreased to $70.6 million from $73.8 million in Q1 2025, while total interest expense also fell to $52.9 million from $55.0 million, resulting in a net interest income of $17.7 million, down from $18.8 million [9][10]. - The average earning assets at amortized cost decreased to $5,078.9 million from $5,422.6 million, and average borrowings also declined to $4,577.6 million from $4,930.2 million [9]. Portfolio and Valuation - As of June 30, 2025, the company’s investment portfolio was valued at $5.2 billion, comprising $4.3 billion in Agency RMBS and $0.9 billion in Agency CMBS, with a debt-to-equity ratio of 6.5x, down from 7.1x at the end of Q1 2025 [3][10]. - The estimated book value per common share as of July 18, 2025, is projected to be between $7.99 and $8.31, reflecting a cautious near-term outlook for Agency RMBS but a favorable long-term outlook due to expected investor demand [4][10]. Dividends and Capital Activities - The company declared a common stock dividend of $0.34 per share, consistent with the previous quarter, to be paid on July 25, 2025 [22]. - During the quarter, the company sold 282,750 shares of common stock for net cash proceeds of $2.2 million and repurchased 96,803 shares of Series C Preferred Stock for $2.3 million [23][24]. Economic Return and Non-GAAP Measures - The economic return for the quarter was calculated as the change in book value per common share of ($0.76) plus dividends declared of $0.34, resulting in an economic return of (4.8)%, compared to a positive return of 2.6% in Q1 2025 [6][10]. - Earnings available for distribution per common share decreased to $0.58 from $0.64 in Q1 2025, indicating a decline in the company’s ability to generate income for distribution [10][43].

Core Insights - The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) is a passively managed ETF launched on November 1, 2006, aimed at providing broad exposure to the Energy - Broad segment of the equity market [1] - The Energy - Broad sector is currently ranked 16th among the 16 Zacks sectors, placing it in the bottom 0% [2] Fund Overview - RSPG has over $428.33 million in assets, making it one of the larger ETFs in the Energy - Broad segment [3] - The ETF seeks to match the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index, which equally weights stocks in the energy sector of the S&P 500 Index [3] Cost Structure - The annual operating expense ratio for RSPG is 0.40%, positioning it as one of the cheaper options in the ETF space [4] - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 2.64% [4] Sector Exposure and Holdings - RSPG has a 100% allocation in the Energy sector, providing concentrated exposure [5] - Valero Energy Corp (VLO) constitutes approximately 4.86% of total assets, with the top 10 holdings accounting for about 46.80% of total assets under management [6] Performance Metrics - As of July 24, 2025, RSPG has gained about 0.82% year-to-date but is down approximately -2.93% over the past year [7] - The ETF has traded between $65.43 and $86.09 in the last 52 weeks, with a beta of 0.87 and a standard deviation of 23.08% over the trailing three-year period [7] Alternatives - RSPG carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), indicating it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to Energy ETFs [8] - Other alternatives include the Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) with $7.15 billion in assets and the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) with $27.57 billion in assets, both of which have lower expense ratios [9]

Group 1 - The Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (NYSEARCA: XMMO) consists of 80 stocks from the S&P MidCap 400 Index that have shown the best price returns over the past twelve months [1] - The ETF has been following this strategy for six years and has delivered significant performance results [1] Group 2 - The Sunday Investor has completed all educational requirements for the Chartered Investment Manager designation and is on track to become a licensed options and derivatives trading advisor [1] - The Sunday Investor focuses on U.S. Equity ETFs and maintains a comprehensive database tracking nearly 1,000 funds [1]

Core Viewpoint - Invesco Ltd. is expanding its active fixed income platform with the launch of two new actively managed ETFs, the Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC) and the Invesco Intermediate Municipal ETF (INTM), enhancing investor options in the fixed income market [2][6]. Company Overview - Invesco Ltd. manages over $491 billion globally across various investment vehicles, including ETFs, mutual funds, and separately managed accounts (SMAs) [2][7]. - The firm has a strong track record in active fixed income management, with a dedicated team of 182 members averaging 18 years of industry experience [3]. Product Details - GTOC is designed as a core portfolio building block, investing in high-quality U.S. investment grade fixed income instruments [9]. - INTM aims to provide federally tax-exempt income by investing at least 80% of its assets in investment grade municipal bonds rated BBB or higher, focusing on high credit quality and intermediate duration [9]. Market Trends - The launch of these ETFs reflects the growing client demand for fixed income and active ETFs, which are significant trends in the current market [5]. - Invesco's strategy aligns with evolving investor preferences for both active and passive investment strategies [5].

Core Insights - The Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials ETF (RSPN) is designed to provide broad exposure to the Industrials sector, launched on November 1, 2006 [1] - The ETF has gained popularity among both institutional and retail investors due to its low cost, transparency, flexibility, and tax efficiency [1][2] - RSPN has amassed assets over $672.39 million, making it an average-sized ETF in its category [3] Index Details - RSPN aims to match the performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Industrials Index, which equally weights stocks in the industrials sector of the S&P 500 Index [3] - The ETF has a 100% allocation in the Industrials sector, providing diversified exposure [5] Costs - The annual operating expenses for RSPN are 0.40%, which is competitive with peer products [4] - The ETF has a 12-month trailing dividend yield of 0.92% [4] Performance and Risk - Year-to-date, RSPN has increased by approximately 10.45%, and it is up about 17.46% over the last 12 months as of July 23, 2025 [7] - The ETF has a beta of 1.09 and a standard deviation of 18.05% for the trailing three-year period, indicating effective diversification of company-specific risk [7] Alternatives - RSPN carries a Zacks ETF Rank of 3 (Hold), suggesting it is a viable option for investors seeking exposure to the Industrials sector [8] - Other alternatives include the Vanguard Industrials ETF (VIS) and the Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI), with VIS having $6 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XLI has $22.49 billion in assets and charges 0.08% [9]