Key Takeaways In the world of commodity investing, category names can obscure critical strategy differences. Funds grouped under the same "broad commodities†label can behave very differently depending on how they allocate across sectors, manage risk, and navigate futures curves. Understanding those differences is essential, because they ultimately determine whether a portfolio captures diversification—or simply concentrates exposure in unexpected places. The WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund (GCC) ...

ATLANTA, Jan. 21, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. (NYSE: IVR) will announce its fourth quarter 2025 results Thursday, January 29, 2026, after market close. A conference call and audio webcast to review fourth quarter 2025 results will be held on Friday, January 30, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. ET. Scheduled to speak are John Anzalone, Chief Executive Officer; Brian Norris, Chief Investment Officer; Kevin Collins, President; David Lyle, Chief Operating Officer and Mark Gregson, Chief Financial Offi ...

Invesco is an independent investment management firm dedicated to delivering an investment experience that helps people get more out of life.Be the first to know! Sign up for Invesco US Blog and get expert investment views as they post.Disclosure for all Invesco US articles: Before investing, carefully read the prospectus and/or summary prospectus and carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. The information provided is for educational purposes only and does not constitute a ...

Core Insights - The Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has performed well over the past year but lacks the consistent compounding growth seen in QQQ over a longer period [1] - CQQQ is sensitive to policy risks and has missed out on significant market changes [1] Company and Industry Analysis - The ETF's performance highlights the volatility and risks associated with investing in Chinese technology stocks, which are influenced by government policies [1] - The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding macroeconomic trends and corporate earnings in evaluating investment opportunities within the technology sector [1]

Core Insights - The Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has performed well over the past year but lacks the consistent compounding growth seen in QQQ over a longer period [1] - CQQQ is sensitive to policy risks and has missed out on significant market changes that could drive growth [1] Company and Industry Analysis - The ETF's performance highlights the volatility and risks associated with investing in Chinese technology stocks, which are influenced by government policies [1] - The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding macroeconomic trends and corporate earnings in evaluating investment opportunities within the technology sector [1]

Core Viewpoint - Invesco is an independent investment management firm focused on enhancing the investment experience for individuals [1] Group 1 - Invesco emphasizes the importance of understanding investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before making investment decisions [1] - The firm provides educational content but does not offer specific investment recommendations or tax advice [1] - Invesco's investment opinions are based on current market conditions and may change without notice [1] Group 2 - Invesco Distributors, Inc. serves as the US distributor for Invesco Ltd.'s retail products and collective trust funds [1] - Invesco Advisers, Inc. and other affiliated investment advisers provide advisory services without selling securities [1] - Invesco Unit Investment Trusts are distributed by Invesco Capital Markets, Inc. and other broker-dealers [1]

Core Insights - The Invesco Food & Beverage ETF (PBJ) and the iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) cater to different investor needs based on their expense ratios, geographic focus, and performance metrics [1][2] Fund Structure and Costs - PBJ has a higher expense ratio of 0.61% compared to KXI's 0.39% [3] - KXI has a significantly larger asset under management (AUM) of $884.8 million versus PBJ's $94.1 million [3] - KXI offers a higher dividend yield of 2.30% compared to PBJ's 1.83% [3] Performance Metrics - KXI outperformed PBJ with a one-year return of 14.8% compared to PBJ's 1.0% [1][3] - Over five years, PBJ's maximum drawdown was -15.84%, while KXI's was -17.43% [5] - The growth of $1,000 over five years was $1,363 for PBJ and $1,322 for KXI [5] Portfolio Composition - KXI holds 96 global consumer staples stocks, primarily in consumer defensive sectors (97%), with major holdings including Walmart and Costco [6][7] - PBJ is more concentrated with just over 30 U.S.-listed stocks, focusing on food and beverage companies, with top positions like Corteva and Monster Beverage [7] Investment Considerations - Both ETFs have generated similar long-term returns, with KXI at 7.6% and PBJ at 7.4% annually over the last 20 years [8] - KXI may be more appealing for investors seeking growth and higher income, while PBJ may attract those looking for stability in U.S. food and beverage companies [10][11]

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF – July (QCJL US) – Portfolio Construction MethodologyThe investment process governing the actively managed FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF – July applies a defined-outcome framework to Nasdaq-100 beta using OCC-cleared FLEX options on the Invesco QQQ Trust across a one-year outcome period that resets each July. The options package purchases puts to deliver a 20% downside buffer and sells call spreads to finance protection and cap upside; remaining assets ...

Core Insights - The Invesco KBW Premium Yield Equity REIT ETF is attracting risk-tolerant investors due to its high yields amidst declining interest rates on fixed-income investments [1][2] Group 1: Yield and Distributions - The ETF has provided over $1.51 per share in monthly distributions over the past year, resulting in a yield of 9.1% based on a closing price of $16.61 [3] - The SEC 30-day yield stands at 7.72%, making it one of the highest-yielding non-mortgage real estate REITs [3] Group 2: Expense Ratio and Investment Focus - The ETF has a net expense ratio of 0.35%, which is relatively low but not the lowest in its category, where peers can have ratios as low as 0.07% [4] - The fund focuses on smaller, riskier REITs, diverging from typical real estate ETFs that invest in larger, more stable companies [6] Group 3: Top Holdings and Risks - The largest holding is Innovative Industrial Properties, which has faced tenant defaults and significant declines in value, shedding 25% over the past year and 73% over five years [7] - The second largest holding, Community Healthcare Trust, has an 11.1% yield but has seen profitability impacted by rising interest expenses, with a 14% decline over the past year and 64% over five years [8] Group 4: Performance Overview - The ETF has received a one-star rating from Morningstar over the past three, five, and ten years, indicating disappointing performance [9] - Shares are down 6% year-over-year and have fallen 21% over the past five years, despite recent gains in the current year [9]

Core Insights - The Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) and the Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) are both U.S. equity ETFs but differ significantly in their investment strategies, with MGK focusing on large growth stocks and RSP employing an equal-weighted approach across the S&P 500 [1][8] Cost and Size Comparison - MGK has a lower expense ratio of 0.07% compared to RSP's 0.20% - As of January 15, 2026, MGK's one-year return is 21.27%, while RSP's is 13.32% - MGK offers a dividend yield of 0.35%, whereas RSP provides a higher yield of 1.64% - MGK has assets under management (AUM) of $32 billion, while RSP has $76 billion [3][4] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over the past five years, MGK experienced a maximum drawdown of -36.02%, compared to RSP's -21.39% - A $1,000 investment in MGK would have grown to $2,034 over five years, while the same investment in RSP would have grown to $1,509 [4][11] Portfolio Composition - RSP tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index, providing broad diversification with 504 holdings, and sector allocations of 16% technology, 15% industrials, and 14% financial services [5][6] - MGK allocates 56% of its assets to technology, 16% to communication services, and 12% to consumer cyclicals, with a concentration in a few large-cap stocks like Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft, which together account for over one-third of its assets [7][9] Investment Implications - RSP is positioned as a more stable investment option with greater diversification and lower risk, while MGK, despite its higher volatility, has a history of outperforming RSP in total returns over both 12-month and five-year periods [10][11]