Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Oracle Corporation common stock between June 12, 2025, and December 16, 2025, of the April 6, 2026, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit related to misleading statements made by the company [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Oracle stock during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by April 6, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff [2]. - The lawsuit alleges that Oracle made false and misleading statements regarding its AI infrastructure strategy, which led to increased capital expenditures without corresponding revenue growth [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, as many firms may not have the necessary experience [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including over $438 million for investors in 2019, and has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements [3]. Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit claims that Oracle's increased spending posed risks to its debt, credit rating, and free cash flow, which were not disclosed to investors [4]. - The misleading representations about Oracle's business operations and prospects resulted in investor damages when the true information became public [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Snowflake Inc. on behalf of purchasers of Class A common stock during the specified Class Period, alleging that the company made misleading positive statements about its business while failing to disclose material negative impacts on consumption and revenues [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit covers purchasers of Snowflake Class A common stock from June 27, 2023, to February 28, 2024 [1]. - The lawsuit claims that during the Class Period, Snowflake's management made positive statements regarding customer usage and product developments, which were later revealed to lack a reasonable basis due to undisclosed negative impacts on consumption and revenues [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased Snowflake Class A common stock during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested parties can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding sellers of Endeavor Group Holdings, Inc. Class A common stock about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to alleged misleading statements and omissions during a specified period [1][5]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class action lawsuit seeks to recover damages for investors who sold Endeavor Class A common stock between January 15, 2025, and March 24, 2025, due to allegedly false and misleading statements in the Information Statement filed with the SEC [5]. - Investors who sold shares during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by March 18, 2026, to represent other class members in directing the litigation [3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering significant settlements for investors [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements, achieving the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and securing over $438 million for investors in 2019 alone [4]. Group 3: Allegations Against Endeavor - The lawsuit alleges that Endeavor's Information Statement misled investors regarding the true value of its shares and failed to adequately disclose executive earnings and conflicts of interest related to the merger [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased REGENXBIO, Inc. securities between February 9, 2022, and January 27, 2026, of the April 14, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased REGENXBIO securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2] - The deadline to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff is April 14, 2026, with the lead plaintiff acting on behalf of other class members [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm specializes in securities class actions and has a strong track record, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3] - The firm was ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for the number of settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [3] Group 3: Case Background - The lawsuit alleges that REGENXBIO provided misleading information regarding its gene therapy product candidate RGX-111, which is intended for treating severe Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I [4] - Defendants made positive assertions about RGX-111's trial success based on favorable biomarker and safety data while concealing material adverse facts about the trial's efficacy and safety [4] - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Beyond Meat, Inc. securities between February 27, 2025, and November 11, 2025, of the March 24, 2026, deadline to become a lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Beyond Meat securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by March 24, 2026 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that Beyond Meat made materially false and misleading statements regarding the book value of its long-lived assets, which could lead to a significant non-cash impairment charge [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [4]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4]. - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, and its founding partner was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020 [4].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of CoreWeave, Inc. securities from March 28, 2025, to December 15, 2025, about the lead plaintiff deadline on March 13, 2026 [1] - Investors who purchased CoreWeave securities during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed against CoreWeave, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that CoreWeave's defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the company's ability to meet customer demand and the risks associated with reliance on a single third-party data center supplier [5] - It is claimed that these misrepresentations were likely to have a material negative impact on CoreWeave's revenue, leading to investor damages when the truth was revealed [5] Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Paysafe Limited securities between March 4, 2025, and November 12, 2025, of the April 7, 2026, deadline to serve as lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Paysafe securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court by April 7, 2026, to serve as lead plaintiff, representing other class members [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company [3]. - The firm has been ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013, recovering hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that during the Class Period, Paysafe made false or misleading statements and failed to disclose significant risks, including exposure to a high-risk client and understated credit loss reserves [4]. - It is claimed that these issues negatively impacted Paysafe's revenue growth and that the company was unlikely to meet its financial guidance for fiscal year 2025, leading to misleading positive statements about its business prospects [4].

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Lakeland Industries, Inc. for alleged misleading statements and undisclosed issues affecting its business performance during the Class Period from December 1, 2023, to December 9, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Lakeland faced significant issues with its Pacific Helmets and Jolly businesses, including shipping delays, production problems, and a slower rollout of new products [5]. - Defendants allegedly overstated the positive impact of these businesses on Lakeland's financial results and the overall strength of operations [5]. - The lawsuit indicates that Lakeland's financial results were deteriorating due to tariff-related challenges, certification delays, and material flow issues in acquired businesses [5]. - It is claimed that the defendants provided unreliable financial guidance and made materially false and misleading public statements throughout the Class Period [5]. Group 2: Participation Information - Investors who purchased Lakeland securities during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To join the class action, interested parties can visit the provided link or contact the law firm for more information [3][6].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of NuScale Power Corporation's Class A common stock about a class action lawsuit and the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on April 20, 2026 [1][3] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025, and November 6, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [3][6] - The lawsuit claims that NuScale made false or misleading statements regarding its partnership with ENTRA1 Energy LLC, which allegedly lacked experience in nuclear power generation [5] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company and being ranked No. 1 for settlements in 2017 [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, highlighting the firm's expertise in this area [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of NuScale Power Corporation's Class A common stock about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to alleged misleading statements made by the company during a specified period [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025, and November 6, 2025, may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by April 20, 2026 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Allegations Against NuScale - The lawsuit alleges that NuScale and its defendants made false and misleading statements regarding ENTRA1 Energy LLC's capabilities, claiming it had experience in nuclear power generation, which it did not possess [5]. - It is claimed that NuScale entrusted significant capital and commercialization efforts to ENTRA1, which lacked the necessary experience in the nuclear energy sector [5]. - The lawsuit suggests that the commercialization strategy of NuScale was exposed to undisclosed risks, leading to potential failures and setbacks when the true information became public [5]. Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has been recognized for securing significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4]. - Rosen Law Firm has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements, being recognized as a leader in the field since 2013 [4].