CS Disco(LAW)
Search documents
ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Tronox Holdings plc Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Fraud Lawsuit – TROX
Globenewswire· 2025-09-16 03:30
Group 1 - The Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Tronox Holdings plc common stock from February 12, 2025, to July 30, 2025, about the lead plaintiff deadline on November 3, 2025 [1][2] - Investors who purchased Tronox common stock during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2][3] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed against Tronox, alleging that the company provided misleading statements about its commercial division and failed to accurately forecast demand for its products, leading to investor damages [5] Group 2 - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in recovering significant amounts for investors [4] - The firm has been recognized for its performance in securities class action settlements, including a record settlement against a Chinese company and ranking highly in the number of settlements since 2013 [4] - Investors are informed that no class has been certified yet, and they have the option to select their counsel or remain absent from the class [7]
ROSEN, A LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – KLC
Globenewswire· 2025-09-16 00:34
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased common stock of KinderCare Learning Companies, Inc. about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit related to the company's October 2024 IPO [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased KinderCare common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 14, 2025 [3]. - The lawsuit alleges that the registration statement was false and/or misleading, failing to disclose incidents of child abuse and neglect at KinderCare facilities, and that the company did not meet minimum care standards [5]. Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4].
ROSEN, A GLOBALLY RESPECTED LAW FIRM, Encourages Lantheus Holdings, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – LNTH
Globenewswire· 2025-09-15 21:42
NEW YORK, Sept. 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, announces the filing of a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of securities of Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LNTH) between February 26, 2025 and August 5, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”). A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than November 10, 2025. SO WHAT: If you purchased Lantheus securities duri ...
ROSEN, A RANKED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages Lockheed Martin Corporation Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important September 26 Deadline in Securities Class Action – LMT
Globenewswire· 2025-09-15 16:55
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 26, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the law firm or visiting their website [3][6]. - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the Court by September 26, 2025, to represent other class members in the litigation [3]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting their own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls, contract commitments, and risk management practices, which led to significant investor losses when the truth was revealed [5]. - Specific claims include the lack of effective internal controls, inaccurate program reviews, and overstated delivery capabilities, all of which contributed to misleading positive statements about the company's business prospects [5].
ROSEN, ATRUSTED AND LEADING LAW FIRM, Encourages PubMatic, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – PUBM
Globenewswire· 2025-09-13 21:57
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased PubMatic, Inc. securities during the specified class period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from February 27, 2025, to August 11, 2025, and the lead plaintiff deadline is October 20, 2025 [1]. - Investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [3]. - The firm has achieved significant settlements in the past, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time [3]. - In 2019, Rosen Law Firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that PubMatic made false and misleading statements regarding its business operations, particularly concerning a major demand side platform buyer shifting clients to a new platform [4]. - This shift resulted in a reduction of ad spend and revenue for PubMatic, contradicting the positive statements made by the company [4]. - The lawsuit claims that when the true details were revealed, investors suffered damages due to the misleading information [4].
ROSEN, A LEADING INVESTOR RIGHTS LAW FIRM, Encourages Snap Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – SNAP
Globenewswire· 2025-09-13 12:35
Group 1 - The Rosen Law Firm is reminding purchasers of Snap Inc. securities from April 29, 2025, to August 5, 2025, about the lead plaintiff deadline on October 20, 2025 [1] - Investors who purchased Snap securities during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the Rosen Law Firm [3][6] Group 2 - The lawsuit alleges that Snap's management created a false impression regarding the company's advertising revenue and growth potential, while downplaying macroeconomic instability [5] - Snap's optimistic reports on advertising growth were misleading, as they were based on an overestimation of the company's execution capabilities, which were already faltering [5]
ROSEN, A LONGSTANDING LAW FIRM, Encourages Fly-E Group, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – FLYE
Globenewswire· 2025-09-10 21:57
Group 1 - The Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Fly-E Group, Inc. securities between July 15, 2025, and August 14, 2025, inclusive [1] - Investors who purchased Fly-E securities during the class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A lead plaintiff must move the Court by November 10, 2025, to represent other class members in directing the litigation [3] Group 2 - The lawsuit alleges that Fly-E Group provided misleading statements regarding the safety of its lithium battery, which negatively impacted its E-vehicle sales revenue [5] - Despite optimistic long-term projections, Fly-E's sales continued to decline while operating expenses increased, leading to a failure in revenue projections [5] - The lawsuit claims that when the true details about the company's performance were revealed, investors suffered damages [5] Group 3 - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements, including the largest against a Chinese company at the time [4] - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its effectiveness in representing investor rights [4]
ROSEN, A HIGHLY RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourage Dow Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - DOW
Prnewswire· 2025-09-10 18:22
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Dow Inc. securities for the period between January 30, 2025, and July 23, 2025, alleging that the company made false and misleading statements regarding its financial condition and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The class action lawsuit claims that Dow Inc. overstated its ability to handle macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, which negatively impacted its business and financial condition [5]. - The lawsuit alleges that Dow's public statements were materially false and misleading, particularly regarding competitive pressures, global sales demand, and product oversupply [5]. - Investors who purchased Dow Inc. securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. Group 2: Next Steps for Investors - Investors wishing to join the class action can do so by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by October 28, 2025, to represent the interests of other class members in the litigation [1][3]. - Until a class is certified, investors are not represented by counsel unless they choose to retain one [7].
ROSEN, A HIGHLY RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourage Dow Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – DOW
Globenewswire· 2025-09-10 17:27
Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Dow Inc. for misleading statements regarding its financial condition and ability to manage macroeconomic challenges during the Class Period from January 30, 2025, to July 23, 2025 [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Dow Inc. overstated its ability to handle macroeconomic and tariff-related challenges, which misled investors about its financial flexibility and dividend sustainability [5]. - It is alleged that Dow Inc. failed to disclose the true extent of negative impacts on its business, including competitive pressures, declining global sales, and product oversupply [5]. - Investors are encouraged to join the class action to seek compensation without upfront costs through a contingency fee arrangement [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Representation - The Rosen Law Firm, known for its success in securities class actions, is representing the investors and has a strong track record in recovering significant amounts for clients [4]. - Investors are advised to select qualified legal counsel, as the Rosen Law Firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Next Steps for Investors - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by October 28, 2025, to represent the class in the lawsuit [1][3].
ROSEN, A HIGHLY RANKED LAW FIRM, Encourages CTO Realty Growth, Inc. Investors to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action – CTO, CTO-PA
Globenewswire· 2025-09-10 16:24
Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased CTO Realty Growth, Inc. securities between February 18, 2021, and June 24, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on October 7, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased CTO Realty securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by October 7, 2025 [3]. - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4]. - The firm has secured significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone, and has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements [4]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that CTO Realty Growth made false and misleading statements regarding the sustainability of its dividends and the profitability of its Ashford Lane property [5]. - It is claimed that the company's business and financial prospects were overstated, leading to investor damages when the true information became public [5].