Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm has filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of purchasers of Lineage, Inc. common stock related to its July 2024 IPO, alleging that the registration statement was misleading and failed to disclose critical information about the company's financial health and market conditions [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that Lineage was experiencing a decline in customer demand due to increased cold-storage supply and a shift in customer inventory strategies post-COVID-19, which was not disclosed in the registration statement [5]. - It is alleged that Lineage had implemented unsustainable price increases prior to the IPO, which could not be maintained in the face of weakening demand [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that Lineage was unable to counteract adverse market trends through operational efficiencies or competitive advantages, leading to stagnant or declining revenue, occupancy rates, and rent prices [5]. Group 2: Investor Information - Investors who purchased Lineage common stock may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - To participate in the class action, investors can visit the provided link or contact the law firm for more information [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff is needed to represent the class, and interested parties must move the court by September 30, 2025 [1][3].

Core Viewpoint - The Portnoy Law Firm is investigating potential securities fraud claims against CS Disco, Inc. and may file a class action on behalf of investors who suffered losses [1][3]. Group 1: Investigation Details - The investigation is initiated following a class action complaint filed on September 19, 2023, covering the period from July 21, 2021, to August 11, 2022 [3]. - The investigation focuses on whether the board of directors of CS Disco breached their fiduciary duties to the company [3]. Group 2: Allegations of Misrepresentation - The complaint alleges that CS Disco highlighted strong revenue growth from its cloud-based electronic discovery platform but failed to disclose significant headwinds that could impact growth [4]. - It is claimed that the company acknowledged its rapid revenue growth was "usage driven" and potentially volatile, yet did not inform investors of any risks [4]. Group 3: Impact of Financial Results - The truth began to emerge on August 11, 2022, when CS Disco reported second-quarter 2022 financial results that fell short of expectations, revealing a significant slowdown in revenue growth [5]. - Following this news, CS Disco's stock price dropped approximately 53% on August 12, 2022, on heavy trading volume [5].

Core Viewpoint - Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. is investigating potential claims against CS Disco, Inc. due to allegations of fiduciary duty breaches by the board of directors during a specified class period [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Financial Impact - The class action complaint alleges that CS Disco misrepresented its revenue growth and failed to disclose significant headwinds affecting its business during the class period from July 21, 2021, to August 11, 2022 [2]. - On August 11, 2022, CS Disco reported financial results that revealed a drastic tapering of revenue growth, leading to a 53% drop in common shares on August 12, 2022, due to heavy trading volume [2]. Group 2: Legal Rights and Contact Information - Long-term stockholders of CS Disco are encouraged to contact Bragar Eagel & Squire for discussions regarding their legal rights and potential claims related to the allegations [1][3]. - The law firm offers no-cost consultations for affected investors to explore their options [3].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Novo Nordisk A/S securities between May 7, 2025, and July 28, 2025, of the September 30, 2025, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Novo Nordisk, alleging that the company provided misleading statements about its growth potential while concealing material adverse facts [4]. - Investors who purchased securities during the specified class period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1][2]. - The lawsuit claims that Novo Nordisk overstated its potential in the GLP-1 market and the likelihood of patients switching to its branded alternatives, leading to investor damages when the true information was revealed [4]. Group 2: Legal Representation - Investors are encouraged to select qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, as many firms may lack the necessary experience and resources [3]. - Rosen Law Firm has a history of successful settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time, and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm was ranked No. 1 for the number of securities class action settlements in 2017 and has consistently ranked in the top 4 since 2013 [3].

Core Points - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Capricor Therapeutics, Inc. securities between October 9, 2024, and July 10, 2025, of the lead plaintiff deadline on September 15, 2025 [1] - Investors may be entitled to compensation through a contingency fee arrangement without any out-of-pocket costs [2] - A class action lawsuit has been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting the firm or visiting their website [3] Case Details - The lawsuit alleges that Capricor provided misleading information regarding its lead cell therapy candidate, deramiocel, for treating cardiomyopathy associated with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) [5] - Defendants allegedly made positive statements about obtaining a Biologics License Application (BLA) from the FDA while concealing adverse facts about the safety and efficacy data from the Phase 2 HOPE-2 trial [5] - The misleading information is claimed to have caused shareholders to purchase securities at inflated prices, leading to damages when the truth was revealed [5] Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - The firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] - Rosen Law Firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has recovered hundreds of millions for investors [4] - The firm has been consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [4]

Core Viewpoint - A class action lawsuit has been filed against XPLR Infrastructure, LP (formerly Nextera Energy Partners, LP) for misleading statements made during the Class Period from September 27, 2023, to January 27, 2025, potentially affecting investors' rights and financial interests [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit claims that XPLR was struggling to maintain its operations as a yieldco, which focuses on delivering cash distributions to investors [5]. - Defendants allegedly made false statements and failed to disclose significant risks associated with financing arrangements that temporarily alleviated operational issues [5]. - The lawsuit asserts that XPLR's business model and distribution growth rate were unsustainable, leading to planned halts in cash distributions to investors [5]. Group 2: Investor Actions - Investors who purchased XPLR common units during the Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - Interested investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly [3][6]. - A lead plaintiff must be appointed by September 8, 2025, to represent the class in the litigation [1][3]. Group 3: Law Firm Credentials - The Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved significant settlements for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 [4]. - The firm has been recognized for its leadership in securities class action settlements and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, about the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 26, 2025 [1]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by September 26, 2025 [3]. - The Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4]. Group 2: Allegations Against Lockheed Martin - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements and failed to disclose critical information regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [5]. - Specific claims include the lack of effective internal controls over risk-adjusted contracts, inaccurate program reviews, and overstated capabilities in meeting contract commitments [5]. - As a result of these alleged misrepresentations, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages when the true information became public [5].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased iRobot Corporation securities during the specified Class Period of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on September 5, 2025, for a class action lawsuit [1][2]. Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought iRobot securities between January 29, 2024, and March 11, 2025, may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1]. - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and those wishing to serve as lead plaintiff must act by the September 5, 2025 deadline [2]. Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a proven track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own success in recovering hundreds of millions for investors [3]. - The firm achieved the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company at the time and has consistently ranked among the top firms for securities class action settlements since 2013 [3]. Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that iRobot made false and misleading statements regarding its Restructuring Plan and its ability to operate profitably as a standalone company after the termination of the Amazon Acquisition [4]. - It is claimed that there was substantial doubt about iRobot's ability to continue as a going concern, and that the defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading throughout the Class Period [4].

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Neogen Corporation common stock between January 5, 2023, and June 3, 2025, of the September 16, 2025, deadline to become lead plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Neogen common stock during the specified period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by submitting a form or contacting the law firm [2][5] - The lead plaintiff must file a motion with the court by September 16, 2025, to represent other class members [2] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [3] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen was recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360 in 2020, and many attorneys at the firm have received accolades from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers [3] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Neogen's defendants made false and misleading statements about the integration process, claiming it was progressing smoothly when it was not [4] - Initially, defendants stated that the integration was "off to a great start" and that Neogen was experiencing solid core growth and profitability [4] - Despite acknowledging certain "inefficiencies" during the integration, defendants downplayed these issues, leading to investor damages when the true situation was revealed [4]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Fiserv, Inc. common stock between July 24, 2024, and July 22, 2025, of the September 22, 2025, deadline to serve as lead plaintiff in a class action lawsuit [1][2] Group 1: Class Action Details - A class action lawsuit has been filed against Fiserv, and investors may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [1][2] - To join the class action, investors can submit a form or contact the law firm for more information [2][5] - The lawsuit claims that Fiserv made false and misleading statements regarding its Clover platform and the forced migration of Payeezy merchants, which concealed a slowdown in new merchant business [4] Group 2: Allegations Against Fiserv - The lawsuit alleges that Fiserv's Clover platform experienced temporary revenue growth due to forced conversions from the Payeezy platform, masking underlying issues [4] - It is claimed that many former Payeezy merchants switched to competing solutions due to Clover's high pricing and compatibility issues, leading to a significant slowdown in Clover's growth [4] - The lawsuit asserts that Fiserv's positive statements about Clover's growth strategies and business prospects were materially false and misleading [4] Group 3: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm has a strong track record in securities class actions, having achieved the largest settlement against a Chinese company at the time and being ranked No. 1 for securities class action settlements in 2017 [3] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, securing over $438 million in 2019 alone [3] - Founding partner Laurence Rosen has been recognized as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar by Law360, and many attorneys at the firm have received accolades from Lawdragon and Super Lawyers [3]