Core Points - Lockheed Martin's subsidiary Sikorsky has secured a contract worth nearly $11 billion from the U.S. Navy to build 99 CH-53K "King Stallion" heavy-lift helicopters, marking the largest order for this model to date [2] - The delivery of these helicopters is scheduled between 2029 and 2034 [2] - Sikorsky, based in Stratford, Connecticut, is renowned for developing both military and civilian helicopters, with notable models including the "Black Hawk," "Sea Hawk," and "King Stallion" [2]

Core Insights - Sikorsky, a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin, has secured a contract worth nearly $11 billion from the U.S. Navy for the production of up to 99 CH-53K King Stallion helicopters [1] Company Summary - Sikorsky is a subsidiary of Lockheed Martin [1] - The contract with the U.S. Navy is significant, amounting to nearly $11 billion [1] - The contract involves the construction of up to 99 helicopters, specifically the CH-53K King Stallion model [1] Industry Summary - The defense industry continues to see substantial contracts awarded, indicating ongoing investment in military capabilities [1] - The CH-53K King Stallion helicopter represents advanced technology in military aviation, reflecting trends in modernization and capability enhancement within the sector [1]

Core Points - Sikorsky, a Lockheed Martin company, has received a $10.855 billion contract from the U.S. Navy to produce up to 99 CH-53K King Stallion helicopters for the U.S. Marine Corps over five years, marking the largest order for this aircraft to date [1][3] - The contract aims to ensure consistent deliveries of the CH-53K helicopters from 2029 to 2034, stabilizing the U.S. industrial base and sustaining thousands of production jobs at Sikorsky and its supply chain [1][3] - The contract consolidates five separate aircraft orders into a multi-year procurement, enhancing price predictability and ensuring a steady flow of materials from 267 suppliers across 37 states and 17 international suppliers [3] Production and Delivery - Sikorsky has delivered 20 CH-53K helicopters to the U.S. Marine Corps, with an additional 63 helicopters currently in various stages of production and assembly [3] - The U.S. Marine Corps has transitioned one CH-53K fleet squadron and has operational and training squadrons supporting its requirements [3] Strategic Importance - The CH-53K helicopter is designed to meet the Marine Corps' lift requirements in modern battlefields, capable of transporting troops, supplies, and heavy equipment while ensuring survivability [3] - The Department of the Navy declared Full Rate Production for the CH-53K program in December 2022, with a Program of Record for 200 aircraft [3]

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)---- $LMT #ClassAction--Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP, a leading national securities law firm, is investigating potential claims against Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin†or the "Company†) (NYSE: LMT) and reminds investors of the September 26, 2025 deadline to seek the role of lead plaintiff in a federal securities class action that has been filed against the Company. Faruqi & Faruqi is a leading national securities law firm with offices in New York, Pennsylvania, California an ...

Core Viewpoint - U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin is actively pursuing opportunities to sell its Thaad missile defense system to European nations as military spending increases in response to Russian threats [1] Group 1: Company Actions - Lockheed Martin is targeting European buyers for its Thaad missile defense system [1] - The company has communicated its intentions to the German newspaper Handelsblatt [1] Group 2: Industry Context - European governments are accelerating military spending due to perceived threats from Russia [1]

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. Litigation Partner Brandon Walker Encourages Investors Who Suffered Losses In Lockheed Martin (LMT) To Contact Him Directly To Discuss Their Options If you purchased or acquired securities in Lockheed Martin between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025 and would like to discuss your legal rights, call Bragar Eagel & Squire partner Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore directly at (212) 355-4648. Click here to participate in the action. NEW YORK, Sept. 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- What ...

Contact Us To Participate or Learn More:If you wish tolearn moreabout this action, or if you have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact us.Charles Linehan, Esq.,Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP,1925 Century Park East, Suite 2100, Los Angeles California 90067 Email: [email protected]Telephone: 310-201-9150 (Toll-Free: 888-773-9224) Visit our website at www.glancylaw.com.Follow us for updates on LinkedIn, Twitter, or Facebook. If yo ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging that the company misled investors about its financial health and internal controls from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Misrepresentations - The lawsuit claims Lockheed Martin overstated its operational capabilities, particularly in the Aeronautics and Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS) segments, while failing to disclose inadequate internal controls [2]. - It is alleged that the company lacked effective procedures to accurately assess program requirements and risks, leading to undisclosed potential significant losses [2]. Group 2: Impact on Stock Price - A series of negative disclosures revealed the truth about the company's financial situation, resulting in significant stock price drops, including a nearly 11% decline on the final disclosure [3]. Group 3: Investigation and Systemic Issues - Hagens Berman is investigating whether the substantial losses were a foreseeable result of poor internal controls and inadequate risk communication to investors [4]. - The investigation suggests that the recurring nature of the losses indicates a systemic issue rather than isolated problems, raising questions about executive awareness of the internal control weaknesses [5]. Group 4: Financial Losses Reported - Lockheed Martin reported $1.8 billion in pre-tax losses in its Aeronautics segment on January 28, 2025, followed by an additional $950 million in pre-tax losses for the same segment and $570 million for the RMS segment on July 22, 2025, linked to issues with the Canadian Maritime Helicopter Program [6].

Core Insights - Geopolitical instability is driving growth for defense companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin, leading to increased U.S. and allied defense budgets for military modernization and procurement [1][10] - Demand for military programs such as the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and missile systems is providing stable revenue for Lockheed, while Boeing benefits from its defense programs and commercial aerospace market exposure [2][3] Financial Strength and Growth Catalysts - Boeing has shown recovery with cash and cash equivalents of $22.97 billion, exceeding its current debt of $8.72 billion, and a current ratio of 1.23, indicating sufficient capital for short-term obligations [4] - Lockheed's cash and cash equivalents were $1.29 billion, significantly lower than its debt, with cash flow from operations declining to $1.61 billion, raising liquidity concerns [5] - The proposed $1.01 trillion U.S. defense budget for fiscal 2026 is expected to benefit both companies, with Boeing receiving $3.1 billion for the F-15EX and $3.5 billion for the F-47 platform [6] - Lockheed is set to gain from a 30% increase in Space Force funding to $40 billion and $25 billion for the 'Golden Dome' missile defense shield [7] - Boeing forecasts a demand for 43,600 new commercial planes by 2044, driven by a 4.2% annual passenger traffic growth rate, benefiting its commercial and services units [8] - Lockheed is strengthening its position as a defense contractor with programs like the F-35 and Trident II D5 missile modernization, alongside increased production rates for various missile systems [9] Market Performance and Valuation - Boeing shares surged 39.3% in the past year, while Lockheed shares declined by 15.8%, despite Lockheed's steadier profile [10] - Lockheed's forward sales multiple is 1.48, which is more attractive compared to Boeing's 1.73 [19] Conclusion - Boeing shows signs of financial recovery and long-term growth potential but remains a high-risk investment due to operational challenges [24] - Lockheed is viewed as a more stable investment choice with a resilient defense portfolio, providing reliable cash flow and shareholder returns [25]

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities between January 23, 2024, and July 21, 2025, of the September 26, 2025, lead plaintiff deadline for a class action lawsuit [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the specified Class Period may be entitled to compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties must move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff by September 26, 2025 [3] - Investors can join the class action by visiting the provided link or contacting the law firm directly for more information [6] Group 2: Law Firm Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions, highlighting its own achievements in this area [4] - The firm has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors, including over $438 million in 2019 alone [4] - Rosen Law Firm has been recognized as a leader in securities class action settlements, ranking No. 1 in 2017 and consistently in the top 4 since 2013 [4] Group 3: Case Allegations - The lawsuit alleges that Lockheed Martin made false and misleading statements regarding its internal controls and risk management practices [5] - Specific claims include the lack of effective procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements and overstating the company's ability to meet contract commitments [5] - As a result of these alleged misrepresentations, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages when the true details became public [5]