Madden to Halftime: ETFs Behind Super Bowl LX | ETF TrendsETF Trends is now VettaFi. Read More -- Months before Super Bowl LX kicks off at Levi's Stadium on February 9, the game was already being played, predicted, and celebrated across screens worldwide through companies held in the [Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF (GAMR)].This year's Super Bowl ETF story runs through gaming simulations, halftime entertainment sponsors, and the advertisers dominating commercial breaks — creating exposure across sector funds ...

Group 1 - Live Nation Entertainment has agreed to acquire ForumNet, a venue operator based in Italy, from holding firm Bastogi [1] - This acquisition aims to strengthen Live Nation's presence in the Italian live entertainment market [1]

Principal Financial Group Inc. grew its stake in shares of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (NYSE:LYV – Free Report) by 22.1% in the 3rd quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The fund owned 9,725,776 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 1,763,511 shares during the period. Live Nation Entertainment comprises about 0.8% of Principal Financial Group Inc.’s holdings, making the stock its 21st biggest holding. Princi ...

Investors interested in Film and Television Production and Distribution stocks are likely familiar with Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) and Live Nation (LYV) . But which of these two stocks is more attractive to value investors? We'll need to take a closer look to find out.The best way to find great value stocks is to pair a strong Zacks Rank with an impressive grade in the Value category of our Style Scores system. The Zacks Rank favors stocks with strong earnings estimate revision trends, and our Style Sco ...

Sen. Marsha Blackburn blasted Ticketmaster and its parent Live Nation on Thursday for its “very insufficient” response to allegations that executives knowingly “turn a blind eye” to automated bots that force customers to pay exorbitant prices.During a Wednesday Senate hearing on online ticket scalping, the Tennessee Republican cited an internal email in which a Ticketmaster executive admitted that the company “turn[s] a blind eye as a matter of policy” when bots exceed ticket purchase limits.Live Nation exe ...

BMAC's efforts and impact, visit [www.bmacoalition.org/impact-reports].About Live Nation UrbanLive Nation Urban (LNU) remains North America's preeminent producer of concert experiences, festivals, and platforms headlined, curated, and owned by Black talent. Operating in partnership with Live Nation Entertainment, the world's leading live entertainment company, the company sets the tone for culture with over a dozen sought-after festival brands such as The Roots Picnic, Broccoli City, Exodus Music & Arts Fes ...

Company and Industry Overview - The U.S. Justice Department has initiated an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment Inc. (LYV) and its subsidiary Ticketmaster, aiming to dismantle the company due to alleged monopolistic practices in the live events industry [2][8] - The lawsuit claims that Live Nation maintains a dominant position by excluding venues that do not use Ticketmaster, which negatively impacts competition, fans, artists, and venues [2] - This legal action follows years of scrutiny and public backlash regarding ticketing practices, including notable incidents such as the problematic ticket release for Bruce Springsteen's 2009 tour and issues during Taylor Swift's Eras Tour in late 2022 [2] Market Reaction - Following a recent court hearing regarding Live Nation's attempt to dismiss the lawsuit, shares of Live Nation (LYV) experienced a 5.8% increase [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Justice Department is pursuing legal action against Live Nation, alleging it operates an illegal monopoly in the live events industry, particularly through its Ticketmaster business unit [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - The Justice Department has indicated that Live Nation has kept concerts away from venues that do not use Ticketmaster, which is a key argument for breaking up the company [1][2]. - A lawsuit was filed by the Justice Department in May 2024, following a two-year investigation, accusing Live Nation of antitrust violations and monopolistic practices [4]. - The lawsuit claims that Live Nation's business model allows it to capture significant fees and revenue, which it then uses to secure exclusive promotion deals with artists, thereby stifling competition [4]. Group 2: Company Response - Live Nation has responded to the allegations by stating that the Justice Department's findings only cite eight instances over 15 years where the company allegedly threatened to withhold concerts from venues [3]. - The company argues that the high prices of concert tickets are attributed to production costs, artist popularity, and online ticket scalping, rather than the actions of concert promoters and ticketing companies [5]. - Live Nation is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed or resolved without a trial, with the trial set to begin on March 2 [3][4]. Group 3: Additional Legal Challenges - In addition to the Justice Department's lawsuit, Live Nation and Ticketmaster are facing a separate lawsuit from the Federal Trade Commission and seven states, alleging deceptive practices related to ticket sales and pricing [6].

The US Justice Department told a federal judge that Live Nation Entertainment Inc. should be broken up because the company maintains a stranglehold over the live events industry, in part by freezing out venues that don’t use its Ticketmaster unit. Venues that dumped Ticketmaster in favor of another ticket seller ended up losing about five concerts a year promoted by Live Nation, which meant forfeiting a combined total of about $1.5 million in revenue, or more than $300,000 per event, according to the govern ...

Core Insights - The article provides a comprehensive evaluation of Netflix in comparison to its competitors in the Entertainment industry, focusing on financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential [1] Company Overview - Netflix operates a single business model centered around its streaming service, boasting over 300 million subscribers globally and the largest television entertainment subscriber base in the U.S. and internationally [2] - The company has expanded its revenue streams by introducing ad-supported subscription plans in 2022, diversifying its income beyond traditional subscription fees [2] Financial Performance - Netflix's Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio stands at 33.02, which is 0.52x lower than the industry average, suggesting potential for growth at a reasonable price [5] - The Price to Book (P/B) ratio is 13.31, indicating that Netflix may be overvalued in terms of book value compared to its peers [5] - The Price to Sales (P/S) ratio of 8.03 is 1.86x higher than the industry average, which may also suggest overvaluation in sales performance [5] - The Return on Equity (ROE) is 9.2%, slightly above the industry average, indicating efficient use of equity to generate profits [5] - Netflix's EBITDA is $7.37 billion, which is 6.82x above the industry average, highlighting strong profitability and cash flow generation [5] - The gross profit of $5.35 billion is 2.88x above the industry average, indicating robust earnings from core operations [5] - Revenue growth of 4.7% is significantly higher than the industry average of 1.07%, showcasing strong demand for Netflix's offerings [5] Debt Management - Netflix has a debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio of 0.54, which is lower than that of its top four peers, indicating a stronger financial position and a favorable balance between debt and equity [9]