亚马逊拟标注“关税成本”，白宫怒批“敌对行为”！

Core Viewpoint - Amazon's plan to label "tariff costs" in product prices has sparked significant controversy and criticism from the White House, indicating potential political ramifications and economic impacts on consumers and businesses [1][3][5]. Group 1: Amazon's Actions - Amazon considered marking up the tariff costs on products sold through its low-cost shopping platform, Amazon Haul, which was met with strong disapproval from the White House [1][3]. - The company clarified that this plan was never approved and would not be implemented, emphasizing that it only pertained to a specific segment of its offerings [3][5]. Group 2: Government Response - White House Press Secretary Levitt condemned Amazon's proposal as "hostile and politicized," questioning the timing of such a move amid rising inflation [3]. - Treasury Secretary Basant criticized Amazon for only listing U.S. tariff costs, arguing that costs from other countries' policies have not been similarly highlighted [3]. Group 3: Economic Impact - The implementation of tariff policies has led to a significant increase in prices on Amazon, with nearly 1,000 products seeing an average price increase of about 30% since the second week of April [5]. - Public support for tariff policies is declining, with a recent poll indicating that 59% of Americans believe the tariffs have worsened the economy, up from 51% in March [7]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The controversy surrounding Amazon's tariff labeling reflects deeper divisions within the U.S. regarding trade policies and their economic implications, highlighting the complex relationship between trade and politics in a globalized economy [7].