ZGXT(SZ:000831) Guan Cha Zhe Wang·2025-05-26 08:06Core Viewpoint - China's strategic dominance in the rare earth and critical minerals sector is resilient and not easily undermined by export controls or attempts from other countries to diversify supply chains [1][6]. Group 1: China's Dominance in Rare Earths - China accounts for approximately 60% of global production of critical minerals and over 85% of refining capacity [1]. - The country produces 40% of the world's refined copper, 70% of refined cobalt, over 60% of lithium, and 99% of battery-grade graphite [1]. - China controls 87% of the global permanent magnet market, with rare earths being a core component [1]. Group 2: Global Supply Chain Dependencies - The US Geological Survey (USGS) indicates that the US relies entirely on imports for 12 critical minerals and has over 50% import dependence for 29 minerals [2]. - China supplies 72% of the US's annual demand for critical minerals, followed by Malaysia (11%) and Japan (6%) [2]. Group 3: Strategic Investments and Education - China has established and funded multiple national-level rare earth laboratories and specialized courses in universities, leading to a strong educational foundation in mining technology [2]. - The country holds the most mining technology patents globally, showcasing its technological leadership [2]. Group 4: Historical Context and Market Impact - The 2010 export ban on rare earths to Japan resulted in a price surge of over 5 times, highlighting China's significant influence on the supply chain [4]. - Despite global efforts to diversify supply chains post-pandemic, China's economies of scale and resource allocation make alternatives challenging for other nations [4]. Group 5: India's Response and Challenges - India is attempting to reduce its supply chain vulnerabilities through the "National Critical Minerals Mission" (NCMM) and aims to engage the private sector in exploration and mining [5]. - The country seeks to build resilient supply chains through platforms like the "Quad," but complete detachment from China is deemed unrealistic and requires long-term efforts [5]. Group 6: Long-term Strategic Considerations - China's dominance in rare earths is a product of long-term strategic planning, supported by government initiatives, advanced processing technologies, and top-tier educational institutions [5]. - Analysts suggest that while China's position is currently strong, it must remain vigilant and invest in foundational research and talent development to mitigate long-term risks [6].