ZPMC(SH:600320) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-14 09:41Core Viewpoint - The Trump administration's proposed 100% tariff on Chinese-manufactured cranes has faced strong opposition from the U.S. port industry, which argues that such measures would hinder development opportunities and impose significant costs on American ports [1][4]. Industry Impact - Approximately 80% of the cranes used in U.S. ports are manufactured in China, with ZPMC holding a dominant market share. The price of a Chinese crane is around $15 million, significantly lower than competitors by several million dollars [2][5]. - The U.S. port operators are urgently requesting the government to delay the tariff implementation, as it could lead to tens of millions of dollars in additional costs for equipment updates, which would ultimately be borne by U.S. stakeholders [1][7]. Government Actions - The tariff discussions began in May, with the U.S. Trade Representative's office holding a tense hearing on imposing tariffs ranging from 20% to 100% on various types of unloading equipment. Despite industry objections, the government has decided to proceed with the controversial policy [4][9]. - There are currently no domestic manufacturers of cranes in the U.S., and only three global companies can produce the required equipment, with European manufacturers unable to meet U.S. demand in the short term [5][7]. Long-term Consequences - The proposed tariffs, combined with existing 25% tariffs from the Biden administration, could exacerbate vulnerabilities in the U.S. port supply chain and negatively impact the competitiveness of U.S. ports globally [7][9]. - The U.S. government's approach to impose tariffs on Chinese cranes and high port fees on Chinese vessels reflects a broader strategy to revive domestic manufacturing, but it may ultimately harm U.S. interests by limiting access to essential equipment [9][10]. Market Dynamics - The rise of Chinese manufacturing is attributed to years of technological accumulation, management innovation, and market expansion, rather than unfair competition. The U.S. government's attempts to reverse market choices through administrative means are seen as unrealistic [10][12]. - The protectionist policies may lead to delays in port equipment upgrades, affecting operational efficiency and increasing logistics costs, which could diminish the price competitiveness of U.S. exports [12].