ZHONGJIN GOLD(SH:600489) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-07-25 12:55Core Viewpoint - The incident involving the drowning of six students at the Wunugutushan Copper-Molybdenum Mine highlights significant safety management failures within Zhongjin Gold and its subsidiary, Inner Mongolia Mining, leading to operational shutdowns and scrutiny from regulatory bodies [2][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 23, six students from Northeast University drowned during a visit to the Wunugutushan Copper-Molybdenum Mine due to a falling steel grating [2][3]. - The mine is a subsidiary of Zhongjin Gold, which holds a 90% stake in Inner Mongolia Mining [2]. - Following the incident, Inner Mongolia Mining announced a production halt, and an investigation team was formed by the local government [2][3]. Group 2: Safety Management Issues - Preliminary investigations revealed that the steel grating had a pre-existing crack, which led to its failure under load [3]. - Despite previous safety training and inspections, the company failed to identify and mitigate the risks associated with the grating [4][8]. - The company had conducted safety training and inspections but did not effectively address the specific hazards present at the site [4][8]. Group 3: Financial and Operational Impact - Zhongjin Gold's safety production investments were reported at 4.67 billion, 4.17 billion, and 4.18 billion yuan for the years 2022 to 2024, totaling 13.02 billion yuan [10]. - The company reported a revenue of 655.56 billion yuan in 2024, with a net profit of 42.04 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 7.01% and 16.21%, respectively [12]. - Inner Mongolia Mining, a key production base for copper and molybdenum, reported an operating income of 5.915 billion yuan and a net profit of 2.280 billion yuan in 2024 [12]. Group 4: ESG Reporting and Ratings - Zhongjin Gold's ESG report indicated that 82 safety inspections were conducted, identifying 1,485 hazards, with a rectification rate of 97.71% [10]. - The company received a CCC rating from MSCI, the lowest tier, while being rated BBB in the domestic market by Wind ESG [12]. - The company’s ESG disclosures have been criticized for lacking comprehensive data on safety management systems and emergency protocols [11].