Tesla(US:TSLA) 3 6 Ke·2025-07-29 02:24Core Viewpoint - The evaluation video by "CCTV News" and "Dongche Di" ranks Tesla's assisted driving system first, while other domestic models, including the AITO Wenjie, lag behind, leading to public scrutiny and allegations of testing bias [1][18]. Group 1: Evaluation and Public Reaction - The evaluation video has sparked significant public debate, with many questioning the integrity of the testing process, including claims of manipulated footage and inconsistent testing distances [1][3][4]. - A notable critic, "怼怼姐," suggested that "Dongche Di" should release backend data from Huawei to address the concerns raised by car owners [7]. - The "第一智驾" blogger and others replicated the evaluation conditions at night, demonstrating that the AITO Wenjie’s AEB system functioned correctly, contrasting with the original evaluation results [8]. Group 2: Industry Perspectives - The controversy highlights broader concerns regarding the reliability of domestic assisted driving systems, with the evaluation suggesting that many systems perform poorly in high-stress scenarios [18][21]. - The Shanghai Jiao Tong University professor emphasized the importance of multi-sensor integration for safety in autonomous driving, arguing that relying solely on visual data is insufficient [11][17]. - The evaluation results from the German consulting firm P3, which ranked the AITO Wenjie M9 first, further complicate the narrative around the credibility of domestic systems compared to Tesla [21][23]. Group 3: Market Implications - The ongoing debate over assisted driving technology may influence consumer perceptions and purchasing decisions, as potential buyers are encouraged to seek diverse information sources before making a decision [10][34]. - The collaboration between BMW and Momenta to develop a dedicated intelligent driving solution indicates a trend towards enhancing safety features in new models, reflecting the industry's response to current challenges [24][28].