外卖大战停火？输家，已下线

Group 1 - The core point of the articles is the ongoing competition among major food delivery platforms like Meituan, Taobao, and Ele.me, which are shifting from aggressive zero-cost promotions to more regulated subsidy strategies while still engaging in significant promotional activities [1][2][7] - On July 18, the State Administration for Market Regulation urged food delivery platforms to further standardize promotional behaviors and engage in rational competition to promote the healthy and sustainable development of the catering service industry [2] - The "first cup of milk tea in autumn" event, which has become a marketing staple since 2020, is set to kick off on August 7, with Taobao already launching its promotional activities [2][3] Group 2 - Despite the cessation of zero-cost promotions, platforms are still engaging in substantial subsidies, with merchants bearing around 70% of the costs [2][5] - Taobao's goal of achieving 100 million orders during its flash sale indicates a dual strategy: maintaining its dominance in e-commerce and rapidly cultivating consumer habits in instant retail [7] - The overlap of consumer bases between food delivery and e-commerce is not a concern, as the industry aims to expand consumption frequency through diversified shopping scenarios [9] Group 3 - The ongoing subsidy war is expected to continue until the end of the year, with the need to cultivate high-loyalty consumer habits within a short timeframe to avoid failure [9] - The true victims of the subsidy war are offline supermarkets, which are increasingly becoming storage facilities for instant retail rather than active participants in the market [10][12] - Major supermarkets with established brands, such as Walmart and Pang Donglai, are refraining from participating in the subsidy war as a strategic self-preservation measure [12]