TENCENT(HK:00700) 3 6 Ke·2025-08-15 12:05Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by veteran player Sun Qianhe against Tencent seeks to compel the company to disclose the matching algorithm of "Honor of Kings," arguing that the game manipulates player win rates to enhance retention rates [1][2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Sun Qianhe's primary demand is for Tencent to publicly disclose the matching algorithm or at least provide a summarized explanation of its basic operational logic to ensure players' right to know the game rules [2][5]. - The court hearings have concluded, but the judgment date remains uncertain, generating significant public interest and debate on social media [1][4]. - Tencent argues that the matching algorithm is a core intellectual property and that its disclosure could lead to unfair competition and an increase in cheating [1][6]. Group 2: Arguments from Both Sides - Sun Qianhe contends that the matching mechanism is unfair, claiming that players on winning streaks are matched with weaker teammates, while those on losing streaks face stronger opponents [5][6]. - Tencent presented evidence during the trial showing that the win rates of randomly selected players do not hover around 50%, countering Sun's claims of manipulated win rates [2][5]. - The company emphasizes that the outcome of matches is influenced by various factors beyond the matching mechanism, such as team coordination and player performance [6][9]. Group 3: Industry Implications - The case raises broader questions about algorithm regulation in the gaming industry, as there are currently no clear legal precedents in China requiring game companies to disclose matching algorithms [9][10]. - Tencent has previously denied any intentional manipulation of player match outcomes and has outlined its algorithm's goal of creating balanced matches based on player skill levels [9][10]. - Industry experts suggest that the matching mechanism is a proprietary technology designed to ensure fair competition, and its forced disclosure could hinder market fairness and technological innovation [10][11].