FLYCO(SH:603868) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-08-18 04:46Core Viewpoint - The public dispute between Leifen's CEO Ye Hongxin and former employee Pan Jian has reached a resolution, with both parties indicating a desire to move on from the conflict [1][2]. Group 1: Company Performance and Product Evaluation - Blogger @Lou Bin Robin criticized Leifen's shaver performance and material quality, suggesting that the pricing of 699 yuan for a three-blade model and 499 yuan for a single-blade model does not match the user experience [2]. - Ye Hongxin responded to the criticism by questioning the integrity of the evaluation process and highlighting that Pan Jian, a former employee, had profited from undermining Leifen [2][6]. - Pan Jian acknowledged his collaboration with competitor Feike and defended his actions as legitimate business strategies rather than betrayal [6][9]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Considerations - Pan Jian emphasized the importance of contractual obligations and criticized Ye Hongxin for attempting to damage his reputation without substantial evidence [7][9]. - He also pointed out that the initial agreement included promises of equity that were not honored, leading to his departure from the company [7]. - Pan Jian warned Ye Hongxin to provide clear evidence for any further accusations or face legal consequences [9]. Group 3: Market Competition and Brand Strategy - The competition between Leifen and Feike is highlighted, with Pan Jian asserting that Feike's F8 shaver has superior technology and user experience [10][12]. - The narrative suggests that the core issue for any company facing challenges lies in product quality and market positioning rather than individual actions [13]. - Pan Jian called for a return to product-focused discussions rather than personal attacks, indicating that the success of a brand ultimately depends on its product strength and market strategy [15].