Workflow
24款驱蚊产品核查:“日本叮叮”只是商标名,无驱蚊成分

Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing demand for mosquito repellent products in Beijing during the autumn season, particularly due to the chikungunya virus outbreak, but also points out issues with unregulated products lacking necessary certifications [1][2] - A total of 24 mosquito repellent products were purchased from various channels, revealing that 15 of them did not display the required "three certificates" (registration number, product standard number, and production license) on their packaging [1][2][11] - Traditional products like mosquito coils and sprays generally complied with regulations, while newer products such as protective patches and wristbands often used vague language to imply effectiveness without proper certification [1][2][11] Group 2 - The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs has stated that any product claiming to repel mosquitoes falls under pesticide regulations and must display the "three certificates" [2][8] - Among the 24 products, 9 explicitly claimed to repel mosquitoes and were properly labeled, while 15 did not have the required certifications, with a significant portion being protective patches and wristbands [2][11] - Some products, like the "Japanese Ding Ding" spray, used misleading branding and marketing tactics to suggest effectiveness without proper labeling [9][10] Group 3 - Several products were found to misrepresent their capabilities, such as a mosquito coil marketed as effective against chikungunya but lacking proper certification and containing misleading information [16][19] - The article also discusses the presence of "three no" products (no manufacturer, no production date, no certification) in the market, which poses safety risks [14][15] - The lack of transparency and regulation in the marketing of these products raises concerns about consumer safety, especially for vulnerable groups like infants and pregnant women [8][14]