Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy surrounding 361° and its endorsement of marathon runner Zhang Shuihua has led to a significant backlash, resulting in the termination of their partnership and raising concerns about the brand's reputation and sales performance [2][4][7]. Company Performance - 361° reported a revenue of 5.705 billion RMB for the first half of 2025, marking an 11.0% year-on-year increase, and a net profit of 858 million RMB, up 8.6% [15][16]. - Despite the positive financial results, the company's stock price fell over 12% following the earnings announcement, leading to a market value loss of approximately 1.2 billion HKD [5][15][17]. - The company's gross margin increased by 0.2 percentage points to 41.5%, while the operating profit margin decreased by 0.7 percentage points to 19.9% [16][19]. Market Position and Strategy - 361° has adopted a cost-effective strategy, with 52.2% of its products priced below 200 RMB, which has helped it achieve significant revenue growth in previous years [25][26]. - The brand's focus on value-for-money has been challenged by competitors who are moving towards high-end and diversified product lines, raising questions about 361°'s long-term growth potential [28][29][32]. - The company has not engaged in any recent acquisitions to diversify its offerings, which contrasts with competitors like Anta and Xtep that are expanding into high-end markets [29][31]. Brand Image and Consumer Perception - The choice to endorse a "grassroots" athlete like Zhang Shuihua was initially seen as a way to connect with consumers, but the subsequent controversy has damaged the brand's image [12][14]. - The incident has highlighted the risks associated with using non-celebrity endorsements, as public perception can quickly shift and impact brand reputation [12][14]. - 361°'s brand identity is heavily tied to its value proposition, making it difficult to pivot towards higher-end products without losing its established consumer base [28][32].
与“最快女护士”解约，361度还没抵达“安全区”