G7和欧盟突然想不开，要和中国稀土比划比划，先朝自己脖子来一刀

Core Viewpoint - The G7 and EU's recent decision to impose minimum prices, tariffs, and carbon taxes on rare earth exports from China reflects a strategic anxiety and a misguided approach to reducing dependency on Chinese resources, which may ultimately harm their own industries rather than China’s [1][3][19] Group 1: Background and Context - The G7 and EU's actions are a response to a series of challenges over the past year, including renewed trade tensions between the US and China and stricter Chinese export controls on rare earths [3][5] - European companies are already feeling the pressure, with some resorting to depleting their inventories due to fears of supply shortages, particularly in the automotive sector [3][5] Group 2: Policy Implications - The G7's plan to set minimum prices and impose tariffs on rare earths is seen as an attempt to force domestic companies to source non-Chinese rare earths, but this could lead to increased costs and operational challenges for these companies [5][11] - The European Union's rare earth reserves account for less than 1% of global supply, making it difficult for them to achieve self-sufficiency in the short term [7][9] Group 3: Industry Impact - Industries heavily reliant on rare earths, such as renewable energy, electronics, and automotive, are likely to face significant cost increases, which could undermine their competitiveness [11][13] - The imposition of minimum prices may disrupt market dynamics, potentially leading to black market activities and further complicating supply chains [11][13] Group 4: China's Position - China remains in a strong position as it controls over 80% of global rare earth supply and is actively seeking to expand its market presence in Asia and Africa [15][19] - The G7 and EU's actions may inadvertently strengthen China's market position by pushing other countries to develop their rare earth resources, which will take time and investment [15][19] Group 5: Future Considerations - The G7 and EU's approach may exacerbate internal structural issues within their industries rather than effectively countering China's dominance in the rare earth market [17][19] - A collaborative approach with China to stabilize supply chains and promote mutual development may be a more effective strategy than isolationist policies [19]