Core Viewpoint - The company,汤臣倍健, has conducted an investigation into allegations of workplace bullying at its subsidiary, Guangzhou Maiyou, and found no evidence to support the claims [1] Group 1: Investigation Findings - The investigation involved interviews with both parties and team members, as well as a review of work records, and concluded that the accused individual did not engage in repeated or malicious behavior [1] - The company’s labor union and labor inspection team were involved in the inquiry, ensuring an objective and fair investigation [1] Group 2: Specific Complaints Addressed - Regarding the complaint about denying leave during the 618 sales period, the accused individual initially expressed dissatisfaction but approved the leave request within five hours after learning about the complainant's family situation [1] - The complaint about requiring work to be submitted "to the second" was clarified as a general team requirement for timely project delivery, not directed at the individual [1] - The claim of personal safety threats was based on incomplete third-party communications, which could not be substantiated [1] Group 3: Employment Termination - The company stated that the complainant's actions since August had led to the spread of unverified information, damaging the reputation of the company and its employees [1] - The complainant was found to have violated company policies and labor contract agreements, leading to the decision to terminate the employment relationship [1] - Following the complainant's refusal to negotiate the termination, the company unilaterally ended the employment contract on October 16, in accordance with labor laws [1]
汤臣倍健声明回应职场霸凌,汤臣倍健职场霸凌调查情况