想和中方谈谈，但荷兰还在狡辩：不是美国让干的

Core Viewpoint - The Dutch government is accused of acting under U.S. pressure to intervene in the operations of the Chinese semiconductor company, Nexperia, despite official denials from Dutch officials [1][2][5]. Group 1: U.S. Influence and Dutch Response - Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs, Vincent Karremans, claims that the intervention in Nexperia was based on national considerations and not influenced by the U.S. [1][2]. - Court documents reveal that U.S. officials had communicated to Dutch officials that Nexperia's Chinese CEO must be replaced for the company to seek exemptions from U.S. sanctions [7][8]. - The Dutch government has taken measures to prevent Nexperia from making any adjustments to its assets, intellectual property, or personnel for one year, citing governance issues [5][8]. Group 2: Impact on Semiconductor Supply Chain - The intervention has raised concerns among major automotive manufacturers in Europe and the U.S. about potential disruptions in chip supply, which are critical for automotive production [10][11]. - The European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA) has warned that the dispute could severely impact the automotive industry due to Nexperia's role in chip production [10][11]. - Reports indicate that Nexperia's inability to guarantee chip deliveries could lead to significant disruptions in U.S. automotive production as early as next month [11][12]. Group 3: Reactions from China - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to the Dutch intervention, emphasizing that it violates market principles and could harm the business environment in the Netherlands [2][3][16]. - Chinese officials have reiterated their commitment to protecting their legitimate rights and interests in response to what they perceive as discriminatory practices against Chinese companies [3][16]. - Observers warn that the Dutch actions could provoke retaliatory measures from China, potentially affecting various sectors, including agriculture [15].