在美国，有多少硕博被当做鉴黄师？

Core Insights - The article discusses the disparity between the high valuations of AI companies and the low wages of the human labor force that supports them, highlighting the exploitation of skilled workers in the AI training process [1][12][48] Group 1: AI Workforce and Compensation - AI evaluators at Google, despite being highly educated, earn only $16 to $21 per hour, translating to about $3,000 per month, which is significantly lower than the salaries of AI engineers [23][25] - The article emphasizes that many AI trainers are experienced professionals, including writers and educators, yet their compensation does not reflect their qualifications [22][27] - The disparity in pay raises questions about the value placed on different skill sets within the tech industry, particularly the undervaluation of humanities and social sciences [28][30] Group 2: Nature of AI Training Work - The work involved in training AI, such as data labeling and content evaluation, is often tedious and resembles assembly line work, with low pay and high expectations [15][16][35] - The article describes the rigorous standards for AI training tasks, where even minor errors can lead to significant penalties, further emphasizing the exploitative nature of the work [17][40] - The industry relies heavily on outsourcing, creating a pyramid structure where a few top engineers benefit while a large number of lower-tier workers are underpaid and overworked [36][43] Group 3: Global Context and Ethical Concerns - The article highlights that the exploitation of labor in AI training is not limited to the U.S., with similar practices observed in other countries, where workers face harsh conditions and low pay [31][45] - It points out that the psychological toll on workers, especially those handling sensitive content, is often overlooked, raising ethical concerns about the treatment of labor in the tech industry [44][48] - The narrative draws parallels between modern AI labor practices and historical labor exploitation, suggesting that the advancements in technology should not come at the cost of human dignity [50][52]