Seek .(US:SKLTY) 3 6 Ke·2025-10-21 01:35Core Insights - The Alpha Arena experiment initiated by nof1.ai pits six leading AI models against each other in a real trading environment, with DeepSeek V3.1 currently leading in profitability [1][2][46]. - Each model started with an initial capital of $10,000 and received identical market data and trading instructions [4][46]. Performance Summary - Top Performers: - DeepSeek V3.1 achieved a profit of $3,677, representing a return of +36.77% [6]. - Grok 4 followed with a profit of $3,168, or +31.68% [6]. - Underperformers: - Gemini 2.5 Pro recorded the largest loss of $3,213, with a return of -32.13% [6]. - GPT-5 also performed poorly, with a loss of $2,509, equating to -25.09% [6]. Trading Dynamics - The trading strategies employed by the models varied, with DeepSeek and Grok showing similar trends, initially incurring losses before recovering and achieving significant gains [32][40]. - Gemini 2.5 Pro and GPT-5 exhibited contrasting behavior, initially gaining before experiencing substantial declines [36][37]. Market Environment - The experiment highlights the rapid changes in financial markets, emphasizing the need for AI models to adapt quickly to market fluctuations [7][45]. - The Alpha Arena serves as a new benchmark for AI performance, moving beyond traditional static assessments to a dynamic trading environment [44][48]. Model Strategies - Each model's strategy involved real-time decision-making based on market indicators and account status, with varying degrees of success [9][48]. - The models' performance is assessed not only on profitability but also on their ability to navigate uncertainty and market volatility [48].