WINNOVATION(SZ:000620) Hua Xia Shi Bao·2025-10-24 13:36Core Viewpoint - Yingxin Development (000620.SZ) has announced a plan to acquire 81.81% of Changxing Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd., which will allow the company to enter the memory packaging and testing sector, despite previous commitments to focus on cultural tourism [2][4]. Group 1: Company Strategy and Financial Performance - The acquisition is seen as a shift in strategy, raising questions about the coherence of Yingxin Development's business direction, especially since it recently rebranded from "Xinhua Group" and aimed to focus on cultural tourism [2][4]. - Yingxin Development has reported negative net profits for the past five and a half years, with revenue declining for three and a half years, casting doubt on the funding sources for the cash acquisition [2][6]. - In 2024, the company reported revenue of 3.043 billion yuan, a year-on-year decline of 21.47%, and a net loss of 533 million yuan, a 251.50% year-on-year drop [7]. Group 2: Market Reaction and Expert Analysis - The stock price surge is attributed to market speculation regarding the cross-industry transformation rather than a rational valuation based on Yingxin Development's fundamentals or the true value of Changxing Semiconductor [3][9]. - Experts express skepticism about the practicality of a cultural tourism and semiconductor packaging integration, highlighting the lack of synergy between the two sectors and the high difficulty of integration [5][6]. - The acquisition agreement lacks specific details on pricing and performance commitments, raising concerns about potential overpayment for low-quality assets [5][6]. Group 3: Industry Context and Competitive Landscape - Changxing Semiconductor, established in 2012, specializes in memory chip packaging and testing, but its competitive position is questioned as it lags behind leading firms in advanced packaging technologies [4][5]. - The customer base for memory packaging is concentrated, and if Changxing Semiconductor is not integrated into established supply chains, it may face intense price competition [5][6]. - The transaction is not classified as a related party transaction and is not expected to constitute a major asset restructuring, which may affect regulatory scrutiny [4].