Cambricon(SH:688256) Tai Mei Ti A P P·2025-11-02 10:02Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant labor dispute involving Cambricon Technologies, where former CTO Liang Jun is suing the company for a total of 4.286 billion yuan in stock incentive losses, marking one of the highest claims in labor dispute history in China [1][3]. Summary by Sections Labor Dispute Announcement - Cambricon Technologies announced that Liang Jun is claiming 4.286 billion yuan for stock incentive losses, asserting that he held 11,523,184 shares indirectly [1][3]. - The lawsuit will set a judicial precedent for high-level executive stock incentive disputes in China's Sci-Tech Innovation Board [1]. Background of Liang Jun - Liang Jun, a key figure in the development of AI chips in China, previously worked at Huawei for 14 years before joining Cambricon in 2017 [4][5]. - He played a crucial role in the company's technological advancements, including the launch of several AI training chips [4][5]. Dispute Details - The conflict escalated after Liang Jun's departure from Cambricon in March 2022, which he claims was due to the company's failure to fulfill contractual obligations [7][14]. - Following the announcement of the lawsuit, Cambricon's stock price dropped significantly, losing nearly 60 billion yuan in market value [8]. Legal Framework - The case hinges on whether the court will view the dispute through labor law or civil partnership logic, which will affect the outcome of the claim [17][18]. - Cambricon argues that the stock incentive agreement is more akin to a partnership dispute rather than a labor compensation issue, which could limit Liang Jun's claims [16][18]. Financial Implications - The potential payout of 4.286 billion yuan is unprecedented in labor disputes, raising questions about the fairness of employee stock ownership plans in tech companies [24][28]. - Liang Jun's initial investment in the stock plan was significantly lower than the amount he is claiming, which may influence the court's perception of the case [25]. Broader Industry Impact - This case may prompt a reevaluation of employee stock ownership structures in Chinese tech firms, highlighting the imbalance of power between founders and key technical personnel [30][31]. - The outcome could set a significant precedent for how tech companies manage executive compensation and stock incentives in the future [32].