ZGXT(SZ:000831) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-11-13 01:53Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government's update of the "critical minerals list" raises concerns about future economic relations with China, especially following recent trade agreements and China's response to rare earth exports [1][4]. Group 1: Critical Minerals List - The updated list includes ten new elements such as copper, silver, metallurgical coal, uranium, and boron, aimed at reducing dependence on foreign adversaries and expanding domestic production [3]. - The inclusion of these minerals will subject them to national security investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act, potentially leading to increased tariffs if supply risks are identified [4]. Group 2: Implications for U.S. Industry - Each newly added mineral corresponds directly to U.S. import dependence on China, indicating a strategic move by the Trump administration to create a "de-China" mineral supply chain [6]. - For instance, metallurgical coal, essential for steel production, has abundant domestic reserves but higher extraction costs compared to China, which could lead to increased production costs for U.S. steel companies if tariffs are imposed [7]. Group 3: Timing and Strategic Intent - The timing of the list's release coincides with the recent U.S.-China tariff truce and the gradual issuance of rare earth export licenses by China, suggesting a dual strategy to leverage both Chinese supplies and domestic production incentives [9]. - Despite the administration's optimistic outlook, challenges such as labor shortages, lengthy environmental approval processes, and outdated extraction technologies may hinder the effectiveness of these policies [9].