澎湃没有惯着腾讯

Core Viewpoint - Tencent faces criticism from the media outlet 澎湃 for its decision to block a news report, raising concerns about the role of information aggregation platforms in media censorship [2][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - 澎湃's investigation team reported on a live-streaming host making false claims about height increase, which was subsequently blocked by Tencent after a complaint was received [3][5]. - This incident marks the second time the investigation team's content has been blocked since its launch [5]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Concerns - 澎湃 argues that Tencent's actions violate the principles outlined in the Civil Code and the Internet News Information Service Management Regulations, questioning the legitimacy of blocking news based on a single complaint [6]. - The outlet criticizes Tencent for allowing the misuse of the complaint mechanism, which could lead to undue interference in news reporting [6]. Group 3: Broader Implications - Many media professionals support 澎湃's stance, expressing frustration over the lack of recourse against such platform actions, emphasizing that complaints should be based on evidence and thorough investigation [8][10]. - The situation reflects a broader concern about the power dynamics between platforms and media, with calls for platforms to not act as the "editor-in-chief" of news content [7][12].