Jincheng Pharm(SZ:300233) Sou Hu Cai Jing·2025-12-13 07:27Core Viewpoint - The case of Zhao Yeqing, former chairman of Jincheng Pharmaceutical, highlights the absurdity of stock price manipulation, resulting in a loss of 7.39 million and a four-year market ban, despite an initial investment of 2.134 billion [2][4][6]. Group 1: Manipulation Details - Zhao Yeqing, along with Wang Zhen and Liu Feng, created a network of 104 accounts to manipulate stock prices over 595 trading days, with 502 days of frequent operations [4]. - At its peak, the self-buying and selling transactions accounted for 45.65% of the market's total volume, pushing the stock price up by 21.3%, significantly exceeding the 2.9% increase of the ChiNext Index during the same period [4]. - Despite a total buy-in of 2.134 billion and a sell-out of 1.87 billion, the operation resulted in a loss of 7.392 million [6]. Group 2: Regulatory Response - The regulatory investigation confirmed the manipulative intent of the three individuals, rejecting their claims of lacking subjective intent to manipulate stock prices [9]. - The total fines imposed amounted to 3 million, with Zhao Yeqing fined 1.5 million, Wang Zhen 1.2 million, and Liu Feng 300,000 [11]. - Zhao Yeqing received a four-year market ban, while Wang Zhen faced a three-year ban, preventing them from engaging in any securities-related activities during this period [11]. Group 3: Corporate Governance Implications - Following the administrative penalty, Zhao Yeqing resigned from all positions within Jincheng Pharmaceutical, emphasizing the separation of personal misconduct from the company [13]. - The incident raises concerns about the effectiveness of internal supervision mechanisms within listed companies, as the manipulation went undetected for nearly three years [13]. - The case serves as a warning for listed companies to strengthen internal governance and oversight of controlling shareholders to prevent similar incidents [15]. Group 4: Market Insights - The manipulation case reflects a broader issue of speculative behavior in the capital market, where individuals believe they can profit from stock price manipulation [17]. - The increasing regulatory scrutiny and the use of advanced technologies for market monitoring indicate a shift towards a more transparent and fair market environment [19]. - The case underscores the importance of adhering to market rules and maintaining a focus on fundamental company performance for long-term investment success [21].