AI 替代岗位，构成违法解雇？

Group 1: AI and Copyright Issues - A group of six authors, including John Carreyrou, has filed a lawsuit against six AI companies, alleging unauthorized use of copyrighted books for training large models [2] - In a previous case, Anthropic settled for $1.5 billion after being found guilty of similar copyright infringement, with eligible authors receiving approximately $3,000 each [2] - The current plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the collective lawsuit format, believing it favors defendants and allows them to settle easily [2] Group 2: Labor Law and AI - A recent arbitration case in Beijing ruled that terminating an employee due to their position being replaced by AI constitutes illegal dismissal [3][4] - The case involved an employee whose role in data collection was eliminated as the company transitioned to an AI-driven model [3] - The arbitration committee determined that the company was attempting to shift the costs and risks of technological change onto the employee, which was deemed unlawful [4] Group 3: AI Emotional Support Regulations - The National Internet Information Office has proposed new regulations for AI emotional support services, focusing on user interaction and data protection [5] - The draft requires clear labeling for non-human interactions and mandates user notifications after two hours of continuous use [5] - It emphasizes strict data usage policies, prohibiting the use of user interaction data for model training without explicit consent [5] Group 4: Cybersecurity and Platform Governance - OpenAI acknowledged challenges in defending its AI browser, Atlas, against prompt injection attacks, despite implementing new security measures [7] - Kuaishou experienced a significant security breach, leading to the temporary suspension of its live streaming feature due to an influx of inappropriate content [9] - The incident raised concerns about the platform's security capabilities, resulting in a more than 3% drop in its stock price [9]