米粉被嘲“屌丝” 却能逼宫雷军 这到底是一个什么群体？

Core Viewpoint - Xiaomi, known for being "the most user-friendly" tech company, faced a significant backlash from its fanbase over a potential collaboration with a controversial digital blogger, leading to a series of rapid corporate responses including employee dismissals and public apologies [1][3][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The controversy began when a digital blogger, "万能的大熊," was rumored to be in talks for a collaboration with Xiaomi, which sparked outrage among Xiaomi fans due to the blogger's previous critical remarks about the company [4][5]. - Fans expressed their discontent on social media, demanding that Xiaomi not proceed with the collaboration, emphasizing that their purchasing decisions were at stake [5][6]. - Xiaomi's public relations team quickly confirmed the discussions but announced the termination of any potential collaboration, highlighting the importance of fan sentiment [5][6]. Group 2: Corporate Response - Following the backlash, Xiaomi took unprecedented actions by dismissing the employee involved in the collaboration discussions and reprimanding management, which is uncommon in the tech industry for a situation that had not yet resulted in direct financial loss [7][8]. - This response marked a significant moment where fans visibly influenced corporate decision-making, showcasing the power of consumer sentiment in shaping company policies [8]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The incident reflects a long-standing pattern of friction between Xiaomi and its fanbase, where critical evaluations of products often lead to polarized reactions and accusations against reviewers [11][12]. - There is speculation about the authenticity of some accounts representing Xiaomi fans, suggesting that not all vocal critics are genuine users, but may be part of a broader ecosystem of interests within the digital content landscape [14][15]. - The situation raises questions about how Xiaomi will navigate its relationship with its fanbase moving forward, especially when faced with dissent from within its own community [16].