从辅助工具到名誉“杀手”，人与AI的“战争”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal battle initiated by lawyer Huang Guigeng against Baidu for generating false negative information about him through its AI, which he claims has severely damaged his reputation and professional credibility [3][17][20]. Group 1: Legal Action and Claims - Huang Guigeng filed a lawsuit against Baidu in September 2025, claiming defamation due to the AI-generated false information that portrayed him as involved in criminal activities [3][17]. - The AI's generated content included serious allegations such as forgery and bribery, which Huang argues were fabricated and misattributed to him [1][8]. - Huang is seeking compensation of 1.09 million yuan for the damages caused by the AI's actions [17]. Group 2: AI's Impact on Reputation - The article highlights that Huang Guigeng is not alone; many individuals have reported similar experiences where AI-generated content has linked them to negative events or fabricated allegations [21][22]. - The AI's ability to generate misleading information has raised concerns about its potential to cause "indiscriminate harm" to individuals' reputations [16][21]. - Huang discovered that the AI's information was not only incorrect but also misattributed, leading to a significant loss of trust from his clients [12][15]. Group 3: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The legal community is grappling with how to address the responsibilities of AI developers and operators in cases of misinformation [5][26]. - There is a debate on whether AI should be treated as a passive information presenter or an active content creator, which affects the liability of the platforms [36][41]. - Experts suggest that platforms should implement stricter verification processes for sensitive information to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future [41][42].