投资者对流动性牛市的分歧

Group 1 - The report highlights a divergence among investors regarding the liquidity bull market, emphasizing that the accumulation of existing assets may have a greater impact on market dynamics than the growth of disposable income [2][10][11] - Historical data shows that improvements in disposable income often lag behind stock market bull runs, indicating that rising income is not a necessary condition for a bull market [11][12] - The report argues that while the current regulatory environment is more stringent compared to the 2014-2015 bull market, this does not preclude the possibility of a similar market direction, as the influx of resident funds can occur through various channels [10][13] Group 2 - Concerns about the impact of stabilizing forces on the height of the bull market are addressed, with the report suggesting that current market gains are still modest compared to the 2014-2015 bull market, making such worries premature [10][15] - The report notes that the initial stages of a bull market often see improvements in specific channels of fund inflow, which may not be immediately apparent until later stages [10][17] - The report anticipates that policy and funding will drive the main upward wave of the bull market, with expectations of increased resident fund inflows as market conditions evolve [22][30]